drinking: is illegal

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents indulgence
Weight: 0.61
, need
Weight: 0.59
, vice
Weight: 0.58
, topic
Weight: 0.58
Siblings bottled water
Weight: 0.66
, wine
Weight: 0.32
, thirst
Weight: 0.32
, chocolate
Weight: 0.31
, temperance
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
is illegal 1.00
be in public illegal 0.91
be illegal in california 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.62
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(vice, is illegal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(drinking, is illegal)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(drinking, is illegal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(vice, is illegal)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.53
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(drinking, is illegal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(vice, is illegal)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(vice, is illegal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(drinking, is illegal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(drinking, is illegal)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(drinking, is illegal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(drinking, is illegal)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(drinking, is illegal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(drinking, be in public illegal)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(drinking, is illegal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(drinking, be illegal in california)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(drinking, is illegal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(drinking, be in public illegal)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(drinking, is illegal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(drinking, be in public illegal)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(drinking, is illegal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(drinking, be illegal in california)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(drinking, is illegal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(drinking, is illegal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(drinking, is illegal)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(drinking, is illegal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(drinking, is illegal)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(drinking, is illegal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(vice, is illegal)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(drinking, is illegal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(vice, is illegal)