drive: be expensive on newegg

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.64
, hit
Weight: 0.61
, quality
Weight: 0.61
, movie
Weight: 0.59
Siblings hard drive
Weight: 0.78
, disk drive
Weight: 0.75
, driver
Weight: 0.33
, fast car
Weight: 0.33
, hard work
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be expensive on newegg 1.00
is expensive 0.84
is cheaper 0.79
be cheaper in canada 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(movie, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(drive, be expensive on newegg)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(drive, be expensive on newegg) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(movie, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(drive, be expensive on newegg) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(movie, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(drive, be expensive on newegg) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(hard drive, be expensive on newegg)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(drive, be expensive on newegg) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(hard drive, is cheaper)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(drive, be expensive on newegg) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(hard drive, is expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(drive, be expensive on newegg) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(fast car, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(movie, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(drive, be expensive on newegg) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(drive, be expensive on newegg)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(drive, be expensive on newegg) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(hard drive, be expensive on newegg) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(hard drive, be expensive on newegg)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(drive, be expensive on newegg) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(hard drive, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(hard drive, is expensive)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(drive, be expensive on newegg) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(fast car, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(fast car, is expensive)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(drive, be expensive on newegg) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(hard drive, is cheaper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(hard drive, is cheaper)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(drive, be expensive on newegg) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(drive, be expensive on newegg)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(drive, be expensive on newegg) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(drive, is expensive)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(drive, be expensive on newegg) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Salient(drive, is expensive)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(drive, be expensive on newegg) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(drive, is expensive)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(drive, be expensive on newegg) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(drive, is cheaper)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(drive, be expensive on newegg) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(drive, is cheaper)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(drive, be expensive on newegg) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(drive, be cheaper in canada)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(drive, be expensive on newegg) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(drive, be cheaper in canada)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(drive, be expensive on newegg) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(drive, is cheaper)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(drive, be expensive on newegg) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(drive, be cheaper in canada)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(drive, be expensive on newegg) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(drive, be cheaper in canada)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(drive, be expensive on newegg) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(drive, is expensive)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(drive, be expensive on newegg) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(drive, is cheaper)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(drive, be expensive on newegg) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(drive, be expensive on newegg) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(drive, be expensive on newegg)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(drive, be expensive on newegg) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(drive, be expensive on newegg)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(drive, be expensive on newegg) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(movie, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(drive, be expensive on newegg) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(hard drive, be expensive on newegg)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(drive, be expensive on newegg) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(hard drive, is cheaper)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(drive, be expensive on newegg) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(hard drive, is expensive)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(drive, be expensive on newegg) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(fast car, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(drive, be expensive on newegg) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(movie, is expensive)