hard drive: is expensive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents disk drive
Weight: 0.79
, drive
Weight: 0.78
, computer disk
Weight: 0.68
, computer hardware
Weight: 0.67
Siblings floppy disk
Weight: 0.66
, save
Weight: 0.52
, flash memory
Weight: 0.34
, laptop computer
Weight: 0.34
, personal computer
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is expensive 1.00
is expensive now 0.94
is expensive right now 0.86
is cheaper 0.85
be expensive on newegg 0.84
be more expensive than features 0.82
is cheap 0.79
be on foods expensive 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.64
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(drive, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(hard drive, is expensive)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(drive, is cheaper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(hard drive, is expensive)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(drive, be expensive on newegg) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(hard drive, is expensive)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(hard drive, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(drive, is expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(hard drive, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(drive, is cheaper)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(hard drive, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(drive, be expensive on newegg)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(hard drive, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(drive, is expensive)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(hard drive, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(drive, is cheaper)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(hard drive, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(drive, be expensive on newegg)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(hard drive, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(floppy disk, is expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(hard drive, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(flash memory, is expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(hard drive, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(laptop computer, be more expensive than features)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(hard drive, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(save, be on foods expensive)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(hard drive, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(save, is cheap)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(drive, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(hard drive, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(hard drive, is expensive)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(drive, is cheaper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(hard drive, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(hard drive, is expensive)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(drive, be expensive on newegg) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(hard drive, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(hard drive, is expensive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(hard drive, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(flash memory, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(flash memory, is expensive)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(hard drive, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(floppy disk, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(floppy disk, is expensive)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(hard drive, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(laptop computer, be more expensive than features) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(laptop computer, be more expensive than features)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(hard drive, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(save, is cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(save, is cheap)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(hard drive, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(save, be on foods expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(save, be on foods expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(hard drive, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(hard drive, is expensive)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(hard drive, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(hard drive, is expensive now)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(hard drive, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(hard drive, is expensive now)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(hard drive, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(hard drive, is expensive now)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(hard drive, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(hard drive, is expensive right now)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(hard drive, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(hard drive, be expensive on newegg)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(hard drive, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(hard drive, be expensive on newegg)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(hard drive, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(hard drive, is expensive now)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(hard drive, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(hard drive, is cheaper)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(hard drive, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(hard drive, is expensive right now)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(hard drive, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(hard drive, is expensive right now)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(hard drive, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(hard drive, be expensive on newegg)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(hard drive, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(hard drive, be expensive on newegg)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(hard drive, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(hard drive, is cheaper)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(hard drive, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(hard drive, is cheaper)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(hard drive, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(hard drive, is expensive right now)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(hard drive, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(hard drive, is cheaper)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(hard drive, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(hard drive, is cheap)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(hard drive, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(hard drive, is cheap)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(hard drive, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(hard drive, is cheap)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(hard drive, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(hard drive, is cheap)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(hard drive, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(hard drive, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(hard drive, is expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(hard drive, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(hard drive, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(hard drive, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(drive, is expensive)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(hard drive, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(drive, is cheaper)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(hard drive, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(drive, be expensive on newegg)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(hard drive, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(floppy disk, is expensive)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(hard drive, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(save, is cheap)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(hard drive, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(flash memory, is expensive)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(hard drive, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(save, be on foods expensive)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(hard drive, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(laptop computer, be more expensive than features)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(hard drive, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(drive, is expensive)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(hard drive, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(drive, is cheaper)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(hard drive, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(drive, be expensive on newegg)