drive: be important for computer

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.64
, hit
Weight: 0.61
, quality
Weight: 0.61
, movie
Weight: 0.59
Siblings hard drive
Weight: 0.78
, disk drive
Weight: 0.75
, driver
Weight: 0.33
, fast car
Weight: 0.33
, hard work
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important for computer 1.00
be in computers 0.87
be identified on computer 0.81
be identified on windows-based computer 0.81
be identified in computer 0.81
be identified on computers 0.80
be identified in mac computer 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(drive, be important for computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(hard drive, be important for computer)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(drive, be important for computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(hard drive, be important for computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(hard drive, be important for computer)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(drive, be important for computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(drive, be important for computer)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(drive, be important for computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(drive, be in computers)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(drive, be important for computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(drive, be in computers)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(drive, be important for computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(drive, be in computers)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(drive, be important for computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(drive, be in computers)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(drive, be important for computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(drive, be identified on windows-based computer)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(drive, be important for computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(drive, be identified on windows-based computer)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(drive, be important for computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(drive, be identified in mac computer)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(drive, be important for computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(drive, be identified in mac computer)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(drive, be important for computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(drive, be identified on windows-based computer)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(drive, be important for computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(drive, be identified in mac computer)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(drive, be important for computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(drive, be identified in mac computer)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(drive, be important for computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(drive, be identified on windows-based computer)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(drive, be important for computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(drive, be important for computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(drive, be important for computer)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(drive, be important for computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(drive, be important for computer)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(drive, be important for computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(hard drive, be important for computer)