driving: be considered hazardous condition

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents behavior
Weight: 0.60
, duty
Weight: 0.57
, activity
Weight: 0.56
, issue
Weight: 0.55
, accident
Weight: 0.53
Siblings drunk driving
Weight: 0.37
, car accident
Weight: 0.34
, motor vehicle
Weight: 0.33
, vehicular accident
Weight: 0.33
, crash
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered hazardous condition 1.00
is dangerous 0.78
be treated in classified situations 0.76
put person at risk for health problems 0.76
is more dangerous 0.76
be considered 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(activity, put person at risk for health problems) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(driving, be considered hazardous condition)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(accident, be treated in classified situations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(driving, be considered hazardous condition)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(driving, be considered hazardous condition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(accident, be treated in classified situations)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(driving, be considered hazardous condition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(activity, put person at risk for health problems)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(driving, be considered hazardous condition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(activity, put person at risk for health problems)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(driving, be considered hazardous condition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(accident, be treated in classified situations)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(driving, be considered hazardous condition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(crash, be considered)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(driving, be considered hazardous condition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(drunk driving, is dangerous)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(activity, put person at risk for health problems) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(driving, be considered hazardous condition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(driving, be considered hazardous condition)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(accident, be treated in classified situations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(driving, be considered hazardous condition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(driving, be considered hazardous condition)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(driving, be considered hazardous condition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(drunk driving, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(drunk driving, is dangerous)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(driving, be considered hazardous condition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(crash, be considered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(crash, be considered)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(driving, be considered hazardous condition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(driving, be considered hazardous condition)

Similarity expansion

0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(driving, be considered hazardous condition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(driving, is more dangerous)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(driving, be considered hazardous condition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(driving, is dangerous)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(driving, be considered hazardous condition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(driving, is more dangerous)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(driving, be considered hazardous condition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(driving, is more dangerous)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(driving, be considered hazardous condition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(driving, is more dangerous)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(driving, be considered hazardous condition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(driving, is dangerous)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(driving, be considered hazardous condition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(driving, is dangerous)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(driving, be considered hazardous condition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(driving, is dangerous)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(driving, be considered hazardous condition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(driving, be considered hazardous condition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(driving, be considered hazardous condition)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(driving, be considered hazardous condition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(driving, be considered hazardous condition)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(driving, be considered hazardous condition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(accident, be treated in classified situations)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(driving, be considered hazardous condition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(activity, put person at risk for health problems)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(driving, be considered hazardous condition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(crash, be considered)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(driving, be considered hazardous condition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(drunk driving, is dangerous)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(driving, be considered hazardous condition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(accident, be treated in classified situations)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(driving, be considered hazardous condition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(activity, put person at risk for health problems)