driving: has state job

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents behavior
Weight: 0.60
, duty
Weight: 0.57
, activity
Weight: 0.56
, issue
Weight: 0.55
, accident
Weight: 0.53
Siblings drunk driving
Weight: 0.37
, car accident
Weight: 0.34
, motor vehicle
Weight: 0.33
, vehicular accident
Weight: 0.33
, crash
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state job 1.00
has state problem 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(issue, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(driving, has state job)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(driving, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(issue, has state problem)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(driving, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(issue, has state problem)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(driving, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(drunk driving, has state problem)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(driving, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(car accident, has state problem)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(issue, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(driving, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(driving, has state job)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(driving, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(car accident, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(car accident, has state problem)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(driving, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(drunk driving, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(drunk driving, has state problem)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(driving, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(driving, has state job)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(driving, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(driving, has state problem)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(driving, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(driving, has state problem)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(driving, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(driving, has state problem)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(driving, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(driving, has state problem)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(driving, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(driving, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(driving, has state job)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(driving, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(driving, has state job)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(driving, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(issue, has state problem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(driving, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(car accident, has state problem)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(driving, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(drunk driving, has state problem)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(driving, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(issue, has state problem)