driving: is car

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents behavior
Weight: 0.60
, duty
Weight: 0.57
, activity
Weight: 0.56
, issue
Weight: 0.55
, accident
Weight: 0.53
Siblings drunk driving
Weight: 0.37
, car accident
Weight: 0.34
, motor vehicle
Weight: 0.33
, vehicular accident
Weight: 0.33
, crash
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is car 1.00
be in car 0.99
buy for scooter 0.80
be with rental cars 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(accident, be with rental cars) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(driving, is car)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(driving, is car) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(accident, be with rental cars)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(driving, is car) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(accident, be with rental cars)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(driving, is car) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(crash, buy for scooter)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.09
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(driving, is car) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(drunk driving, be in car)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(accident, be with rental cars) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(driving, is car) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(driving, is car)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(driving, is car) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(drunk driving, be in car) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(drunk driving, be in car)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(driving, is car) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(crash, buy for scooter) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(crash, buy for scooter)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(driving, is car) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(driving, is car)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(driving, is car) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(driving, is car) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(driving, is car)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(driving, is car) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(driving, is car)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(driving, is car) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(accident, be with rental cars)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(driving, is car) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(drunk driving, be in car)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(driving, is car) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(crash, buy for scooter)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(driving, is car) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(accident, be with rental cars)