drunk driving: be in car

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents car accident
Weight: 0.69
, behavior
Weight: 0.68
, accident
Weight: 0.68
, crime
Weight: 0.68
, felony
Weight: 0.66
Siblings driving
Weight: 0.37
, vehicular accident
Weight: 0.35
, crash
Weight: 0.35
, plane crash
Weight: 0.35
, sexual assault
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in car 1.00
is car 0.99
buy for scooter 0.80
be with rental cars 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(accident, be with rental cars) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(drunk driving, be in car)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(drunk driving, be in car) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(accident, be with rental cars)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(drunk driving, be in car) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(accident, be with rental cars)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(drunk driving, be in car) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(crash, buy for scooter)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.09
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(drunk driving, be in car) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(driving, is car)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(accident, be with rental cars) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(drunk driving, be in car) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(drunk driving, be in car)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(drunk driving, be in car) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(driving, is car) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(driving, is car)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(drunk driving, be in car) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(crash, buy for scooter) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(crash, buy for scooter)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(drunk driving, be in car) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(drunk driving, be in car)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(drunk driving, be in car) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(drunk driving, be in car) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(drunk driving, be in car)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(drunk driving, be in car) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(drunk driving, be in car)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(drunk driving, be in car) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(accident, be with rental cars)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(drunk driving, be in car) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(driving, is car)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(drunk driving, be in car) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(crash, buy for scooter)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(drunk driving, be in car) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(accident, be with rental cars)