drought: be constant hazard for australia

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents emergency
Weight: 0.64
, crisis
Weight: 0.63
, stress
Weight: 0.60
, event
Weight: 0.58
, bad weather
Weight: 0.58
Siblings flood
Weight: 0.34
, situation
Weight: 0.32
, rain
Weight: 0.32
, overpopulation
Weight: 0.32
, global warming
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be constant hazard for australia 1.00
be problem in australia 0.83
be in australia 0.81
occur in australia 0.80
happen in australia 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(drought, be constant hazard for australia)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(drought, be constant hazard for australia)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(drought, be constant hazard for australia)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(drought, be in australia)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(drought, be constant hazard for australia)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(drought, be in australia)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(drought, be constant hazard for australia)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(drought, happen in australia)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(drought, be constant hazard for australia)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(drought, happen in australia)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(drought, be constant hazard for australia)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(drought, be problem in australia)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(drought, be constant hazard for australia)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(drought, be in australia)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(drought, be constant hazard for australia)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(drought, be problem in australia)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(drought, be constant hazard for australia)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(drought, be problem in australia)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(drought, be constant hazard for australia)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(drought, happen in australia)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(drought, be constant hazard for australia)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(drought, happen in australia)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(drought, be constant hazard for australia)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(drought, be in australia)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(drought, be constant hazard for australia)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(drought, occur in australia)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(drought, be constant hazard for australia)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(drought, occur in australia)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(drought, be constant hazard for australia)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(drought, occur in australia)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(drought, be constant hazard for australia)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(drought, be problem in australia)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(drought, be constant hazard for australia)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(drought, occur in australia)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(drought, be constant hazard for australia)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(drought, be constant hazard for australia)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(drought, be constant hazard for australia)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(drought, be constant hazard for australia)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(drought, be constant hazard for australia)