drought: be problem for farmers

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents emergency
Weight: 0.64
, crisis
Weight: 0.63
, stress
Weight: 0.60
, event
Weight: 0.58
, bad weather
Weight: 0.58
Siblings flood
Weight: 0.34
, situation
Weight: 0.32
, rain
Weight: 0.32
, overpopulation
Weight: 0.32
, global warming
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be problem for farmers 1.00
be problem for farmers in sahel 1.00
be bad for farmers 0.93
be expensive for farmers 0.91
affect farmers 0.91
affects farmers 0.88
affect agriculture 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(drought, be problem for farmers)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(flood, affect agriculture)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(drought, be problem for farmers)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(flood, affect agriculture)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(flood, affect agriculture)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(drought, be problem for farmers)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(drought, be problem for farmers)

Similarity expansion

0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(drought, be problem for farmers)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(drought, be problem for farmers in sahel)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(drought, be problem for farmers)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(drought, be problem for farmers in sahel)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(drought, be problem for farmers)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(drought, be problem for farmers in sahel)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(drought, be problem for farmers)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(drought, be bad for farmers)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(drought, be problem for farmers)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(drought, be bad for farmers)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(drought, be problem for farmers)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(drought, be expensive for farmers)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(drought, be problem for farmers)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(drought, be problem for farmers in sahel)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(drought, be problem for farmers)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(drought, be expensive for farmers)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(drought, be problem for farmers)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(drought, be bad for farmers)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(drought, be problem for farmers)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(drought, be expensive for farmers)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(drought, be problem for farmers)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(drought, be expensive for farmers)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(drought, be problem for farmers)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(drought, affect agriculture)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(drought, be problem for farmers)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(drought, affect agriculture)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(drought, be problem for farmers)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(drought, affect agriculture)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(drought, be problem for farmers)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(drought, be bad for farmers)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(drought, be problem for farmers)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(drought, affect agriculture)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(drought, be problem for farmers)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(drought, be problem for farmers)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(drought, be problem for farmers)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(drought, be problem for farmers)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(drought, be problem for farmers)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(drought, be problem for farmers)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(flood, affect agriculture)