drought: be bad for farmers

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents emergency
Weight: 0.64
, crisis
Weight: 0.63
, stress
Weight: 0.60
, event
Weight: 0.58
, bad weather
Weight: 0.58
Siblings flood
Weight: 0.34
, situation
Weight: 0.32
, rain
Weight: 0.32
, overpopulation
Weight: 0.32
, global warming
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad for farmers 1.00
be expensive for farmers 0.94
affect farmers 0.94
be problem for farmers in sahel 0.94
be problem for farmers 0.93
affects farmers 0.88
be bad to people 0.79
affect agriculture 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(drought, be bad for farmers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(flood, affect agriculture)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(drought, be bad for farmers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(flood, affect agriculture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(flood, affect agriculture)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(drought, be bad for farmers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(drought, be bad for farmers)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(drought, be bad for farmers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(drought, be problem for farmers in sahel)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(drought, be bad for farmers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(drought, be problem for farmers in sahel)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(drought, be bad for farmers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(drought, be expensive for farmers)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(drought, be bad for farmers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(drought, be expensive for farmers)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(drought, be bad for farmers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(drought, be problem for farmers in sahel)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(drought, be bad for farmers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(drought, be expensive for farmers)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(drought, be bad for farmers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(drought, be problem for farmers)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(drought, be bad for farmers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(drought, be bad to people)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(drought, be bad for farmers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(drought, be problem for farmers)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(drought, be bad for farmers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(drought, be problem for farmers in sahel)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(drought, be bad for farmers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(drought, affect agriculture)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(drought, be bad for farmers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(drought, be expensive for farmers)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(drought, be bad for farmers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(drought, be bad to people)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(drought, be bad for farmers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(drought, be bad to people)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(drought, be bad for farmers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(drought, be problem for farmers)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(drought, be bad for farmers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(drought, be problem for farmers)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(drought, be bad for farmers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(drought, affect agriculture)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(drought, be bad for farmers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(drought, be bad to people)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(drought, be bad for farmers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(drought, affect agriculture)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(drought, be bad for farmers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(drought, affect agriculture)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(drought, be bad for farmers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(drought, be bad for farmers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(drought, be bad for farmers)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(drought, be bad for farmers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(drought, be bad for farmers)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(drought, be bad for farmers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(flood, affect agriculture)