drought: be bad to people

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents emergency
Weight: 0.64
, crisis
Weight: 0.63
, stress
Weight: 0.60
, event
Weight: 0.58
, bad weather
Weight: 0.58
Siblings flood
Weight: 0.34
, situation
Weight: 0.32
, rain
Weight: 0.32
, overpopulation
Weight: 0.32
, global warming
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad to people 1.00
be bad for farmers 0.79
has quality bad 0.79
be bad for environment 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(stress, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(drought, be bad to people)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(drought, be bad to people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(stress, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(drought, be bad to people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(stress, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(drought, be bad to people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(global warming, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(drought, be bad to people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(drought, be bad to people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(rain, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(drought, be bad to people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(flood, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(drought, be bad to people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(rain, be bad for environment)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(stress, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(drought, be bad to people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(drought, be bad to people)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(drought, be bad to people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(flood, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(flood, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(drought, be bad to people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(overpopulation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(drought, be bad to people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(rain, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(rain, be bad for environment)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(drought, be bad to people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(rain, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(rain, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(drought, be bad to people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(global warming, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(global warming, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(drought, be bad to people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(drought, be bad to people)

Similarity expansion

0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(drought, be bad to people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(drought, be bad for environment)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(drought, be bad to people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(drought, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(drought, be bad to people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(drought, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(drought, be bad to people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(drought, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(drought, be bad to people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(drought, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(drought, be bad to people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(drought, be bad for environment)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(drought, be bad to people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(drought, be bad for farmers)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(drought, be bad to people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(drought, be bad for environment)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(drought, be bad to people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(drought, be bad for farmers)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(drought, be bad to people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(drought, be bad for farmers)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(drought, be bad to people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(drought, be bad for environment)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(drought, be bad to people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(drought, be bad for farmers)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(drought, be bad to people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(drought, be bad to people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(drought, be bad to people)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(drought, be bad to people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(drought, be bad to people)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(drought, be bad to people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(stress, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(drought, be bad to people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(overpopulation, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(drought, be bad to people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(global warming, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(drought, be bad to people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(flood, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(drought, be bad to people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(rain, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(drought, be bad to people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(rain, be bad for environment)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(drought, be bad to people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(stress, has quality bad)