drug dealer: is poor

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents crime
Weight: 0.64
, client
Weight: 0.63
, criminal
Weight: 0.62
, person
Weight: 0.62
Siblings drug
Weight: 0.59
, drug addict
Weight: 0.37
, drug use
Weight: 0.36
, pharmacist
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is poor 1.00
has quality bad 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(client, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(drug dealer, is poor)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(crime, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(drug dealer, is poor)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(drug dealer, is poor)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(crime, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(drug dealer, is poor)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(client, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(drug dealer, is poor)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(client, has quality bad)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(drug dealer, is poor)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(crime, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(drug dealer, is poor)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(drug use, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(drug dealer, is poor)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(drug, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(client, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(drug dealer, is poor)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(drug dealer, is poor)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(crime, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(drug dealer, is poor)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(drug dealer, is poor)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(drug dealer, is poor)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(drug, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(drug, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(drug dealer, is poor)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(drug use, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(drug use, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(drug dealer, is poor)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(drug dealer, is poor)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(drug dealer, is poor)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(drug dealer, is poor)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(drug dealer, is poor)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(drug dealer, is poor)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(drug dealer, is poor)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(drug dealer, is poor)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(crime, has quality bad)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(drug dealer, is poor)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(client, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(drug dealer, is poor)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(drug use, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(drug dealer, is poor)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(drug, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(drug dealer, is poor)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(crime, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(drug dealer, is poor)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(client, has quality bad)