drug use: has quality effects

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents activity
Weight: 0.66
, risk
Weight: 0.66
, crime
Weight: 0.66
Siblings cigarette smoking
Weight: 0.69
, meth
Weight: 0.69
, methamphetamine
Weight: 0.67
, sexual activity
Weight: 0.66
, alcohol
Weight: 0.63

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality effects 1.00
has quality bad 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(crime, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(drug use, has quality effects)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(risk, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(drug use, has quality effects)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(drug use, has quality effects) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(risk, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(drug use, has quality effects) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(crime, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(drug use, has quality effects) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(risk, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(drug use, has quality effects) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(crime, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(drug use, has quality effects) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(meth, has quality bad)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(drug use, has quality effects) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(cigarette smoking, has quality bad)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(drug use, has quality effects) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(alcohol, has quality bad)
0.00
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.03
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(drug use, has quality effects) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(cigarette smoking, has quality effects)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(crime, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(drug use, has quality effects) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(drug use, has quality effects)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(risk, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(drug use, has quality effects) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(drug use, has quality effects)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(drug use, has quality effects) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(cigarette smoking, has quality effects) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(cigarette smoking, has quality effects)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(drug use, has quality effects) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(alcohol, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(alcohol, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(drug use, has quality effects) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(cigarette smoking, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(cigarette smoking, has quality bad)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(drug use, has quality effects) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(meth, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(meth, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(drug use, has quality effects) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(drug use, has quality effects)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(drug use, has quality effects) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(drug use, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(drug use, has quality effects) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(drug use, has quality bad)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(drug use, has quality effects) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(drug use, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(drug use, has quality effects) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(drug use, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(drug use, has quality effects) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(drug use, has quality effects) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(drug use, has quality effects)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(drug use, has quality effects) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(drug use, has quality effects)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(drug use, has quality effects) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(risk, has quality bad)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(drug use, has quality effects) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(crime, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(drug use, has quality effects) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(cigarette smoking, has quality effects)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(drug use, has quality effects) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(cigarette smoking, has quality bad)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(drug use, has quality effects) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(meth, has quality bad)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.07
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(drug use, has quality effects) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(alcohol, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(drug use, has quality effects) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(risk, has quality bad)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(drug use, has quality effects) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(crime, has quality bad)