drunk: has state love

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.53
, song
Weight: 0.50
, hit
Weight: 0.48
, criminal
Weight: 0.47
Siblings drunk people
Weight: 0.35
, booze
Weight: 0.32
, bad breath
Weight: 0.32
, sobriety
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state love 1.00
has state problem 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(song, has state love) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(drunk, has state love)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(drunk, has state love) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(song, has state love)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.49
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(drunk, has state love) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(song, has state love)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(song, has state love) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(drunk, has state love) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(drunk, has state love)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(drunk, has state love) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(drunk, has state love)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(drunk, has state love) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(drunk, has state problem)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(drunk, has state love) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(drunk, has state problem)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(drunk, has state love) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(drunk, has state problem)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(drunk, has state love) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(drunk, has state problem)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(drunk, has state love) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(drunk, has state love) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(drunk, has state love)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(drunk, has state love) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(drunk, has state love)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(drunk, has state love) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(song, has state love)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(drunk, has state love) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(song, has state love)