drunk: has state problem

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.53
, song
Weight: 0.50
, hit
Weight: 0.48
, criminal
Weight: 0.47
Siblings drunk people
Weight: 0.35
, booze
Weight: 0.32
, bad breath
Weight: 0.32
, sobriety
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state problem 1.00
drive problem 0.83
drive social problem 0.80
is issue 0.78
be issue 0.77
has state love 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(song, has state love) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(drunk, has state problem)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(drunk, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(song, has state love)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(drunk, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(song, has state love)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(song, has state love) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(drunk, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(drunk, has state problem)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(drunk, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(drunk, has state problem)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(drunk, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(drunk, drive problem)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(drunk, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(drunk, drive problem)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(drunk, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(drunk, drive problem)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(drunk, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(drunk, drive social problem)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(drunk, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(drunk, drive social problem)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(drunk, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(drunk, drive social problem)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(drunk, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(drunk, drive social problem)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(drunk, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(drunk, drive problem)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(drunk, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(drunk, is issue)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(drunk, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(drunk, be issue)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(drunk, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(drunk, be issue)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(drunk, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(drunk, be issue)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(drunk, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(drunk, is issue)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(drunk, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(drunk, is issue)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(drunk, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(drunk, be issue)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(drunk, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(drunk, has state love)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(drunk, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(drunk, has state love)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(drunk, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(drunk, has state love)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(drunk, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(drunk, has state love)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(drunk, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(drunk, is issue)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(drunk, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(drunk, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(drunk, has state problem)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(drunk, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(drunk, has state problem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(drunk, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(song, has state love)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(drunk, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(song, has state love)