dryer: be bad for environment

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents household appliance
Weight: 0.68
, item
Weight: 0.56
, system
Weight: 0.54
, thing
Weight: 0.52
Siblings hair dryer
Weight: 0.71
, clothes dryer
Weight: 0.40
, microwave oven
Weight: 0.37
, water heater
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad for environment 1.00
has quality bad 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(system, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(dryer, be bad for environment)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(dryer, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(system, be bad for environment)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.56
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(dryer, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(system, be bad for environment)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(dryer, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(hair dryer, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(dryer, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(microwave oven, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(system, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(dryer, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(dryer, be bad for environment)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(dryer, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(hair dryer, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(hair dryer, has quality bad)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(dryer, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(microwave oven, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(microwave oven, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(dryer, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(dryer, be bad for environment)

Similarity expansion

0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(dryer, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(dryer, has quality bad)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(dryer, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(dryer, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(dryer, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(dryer, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(dryer, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(dryer, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(dryer, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(dryer, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(dryer, be bad for environment)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(dryer, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(dryer, be bad for environment)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(dryer, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(system, be bad for environment)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(dryer, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(hair dryer, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(dryer, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(microwave oven, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(dryer, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(system, be bad for environment)