drywall: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents material
Weight: 0.65
, product
Weight: 0.60
, wall
Weight: 0.55
, substrate
Weight: 0.55
, raw material
Weight: 0.53
Siblings flooring
Weight: 0.35
, lumber
Weight: 0.34
, gypsum
Weight: 0.34
, duct tape
Weight: 0.34
, vinyl
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality standard 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(drywall, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(vinyl, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(drywall, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(vinyl, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(vinyl, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(drywall, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(drywall, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(drywall, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(drywall, has quality standard)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(drywall, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(drywall, has quality standard)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(drywall, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(drywall, has quality standard)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(drywall, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(drywall, has quality standard)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(drywall, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(drywall, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(drywall, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(drywall, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(drywall, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(drywall, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(vinyl, has quality bad)