duck: be a part of animal

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents wild animal
Weight: 0.65
, bird
Weight: 0.65
, dish
Weight: 0.60
, thing
Weight: 0.57
Siblings mallard
Weight: 0.60
, goose
Weight: 0.36
, peregrine falcon
Weight: 0.36
, blue bird
Weight: 0.36
, pigeon
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be a part of animal 1.00
be used to food for other animal 0.89
be defined as animal which live in forest 0.84
be person pet 0.81
be used to have for pet 0.81
be pet 0.80
prey eat small animal 0.80
has feather no other animal doe 0.79
be good pet 0.79
be used to keep as pet 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(wild animal, be defined as animal which live in forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(duck, be a part of animal)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(bird, prey eat small animal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(duck, be a part of animal)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(bird, has feather no other animal doe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(duck, be a part of animal)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(bird, be pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(duck, be a part of animal)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(bird, be good pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(duck, be a part of animal)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(duck, be a part of animal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(wild animal, be defined as animal which live in forest)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(duck, be a part of animal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(bird, be good pet)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(duck, be a part of animal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(bird, be pet)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(duck, be a part of animal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(bird, has feather no other animal doe)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(duck, be a part of animal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(bird, prey eat small animal)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(duck, be a part of animal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(bird, prey eat small animal)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(duck, be a part of animal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(bird, has feather no other animal doe)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(duck, be a part of animal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(wild animal, be defined as animal which live in forest)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(duck, be a part of animal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(bird, be pet)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(duck, be a part of animal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(bird, be good pet)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(wild animal, be defined as animal which live in forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(duck, be a part of animal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(duck, be a part of animal)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(bird, prey eat small animal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(duck, be a part of animal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(duck, be a part of animal)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(bird, has feather no other animal doe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(duck, be a part of animal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(duck, be a part of animal)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(bird, be pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(duck, be a part of animal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(duck, be a part of animal)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(bird, be good pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(duck, be a part of animal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(duck, be a part of animal)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(duck, be a part of animal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(duck, be a part of animal)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(duck, be a part of animal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(duck, be used to food for other animal)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(duck, be a part of animal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(duck, be used to food for other animal)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(duck, be a part of animal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(duck, be used to food for other animal)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(duck, be a part of animal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(duck, be used to food for other animal)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(duck, be a part of animal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(duck, be a part of animal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(duck, be a part of animal)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(duck, be a part of animal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(duck, be a part of animal)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(duck, be a part of animal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(wild animal, be defined as animal which live in forest)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(duck, be a part of animal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(bird, prey eat small animal)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(duck, be a part of animal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(bird, be pet)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(duck, be a part of animal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(bird, has feather no other animal doe)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(duck, be a part of animal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(bird, be good pet)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(duck, be a part of animal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(wild animal, be defined as animal which live in forest)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(duck, be a part of animal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(bird, prey eat small animal)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(duck, be a part of animal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(bird, be pet)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(duck, be a part of animal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(bird, has feather no other animal doe)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(duck, be a part of animal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(bird, be good pet)