duck: has beak

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fowl
Weight: 0.66
, bird
Weight: 0.65
, dish
Weight: 0.60
Siblings goldeneye
Weight: 0.64
, mallard
Weight: 0.60
, coot
Weight: 0.58
, snow goose
Weight: 0.56

Related properties

Property Similarity
has beak 1.00
put beak in feathers 0.94
has physical part beaks 0.82
have tail feathers 0.81
have feathers 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(bird, has beak)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(duck, has beak)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(bird, have feathers)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(duck, has beak)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(bird, has physical part beaks)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(duck, has beak)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(duck, has beak)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(bird, has beak)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(duck, has beak)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(bird, has physical part beaks)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(duck, has beak)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(bird, have feathers)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(duck, has beak)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(bird, has physical part beaks)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(duck, has beak)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(bird, has beak)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.09
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(duck, has beak)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(bird, have feathers)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(duck, has beak)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(mallard, has physical part beaks)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(duck, has beak)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(mallard, have feathers)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(bird, has beak)
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(duck, has beak)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(duck, has beak)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(bird, has physical part beaks)
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(duck, has beak)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(duck, has beak)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(bird, have feathers)
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(duck, has beak)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(duck, has beak)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(duck, has beak)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(mallard, has physical part beaks)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(mallard, has physical part beaks)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(duck, has beak)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(mallard, have feathers)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(mallard, have feathers)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(duck, has beak)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(duck, has beak)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(duck, has beak)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(duck, put beak in feathers)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(duck, has beak)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(duck, put beak in feathers)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(duck, has beak)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(duck, have feathers)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(duck, has beak)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(duck, put beak in feathers)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(duck, has beak)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(duck, have feathers)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(duck, has beak)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(duck, have feathers)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(duck, has beak)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(duck, have feathers)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(duck, has beak)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(duck, put beak in feathers)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(duck, has beak)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(duck, has beak)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(duck, has beak)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(duck, has beak)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(duck, has beak)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(duck, has beak)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(bird, has beak)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(duck, has beak)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(bird, has physical part beaks)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(duck, has beak)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(bird, have feathers)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(duck, has beak)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(mallard, have feathers)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(duck, has beak)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(mallard, has physical part beaks)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(duck, has beak)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(bird, has beak)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(duck, has beak)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(bird, has physical part beaks)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(duck, has beak)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(bird, have feathers)