duct tape: be at cabinet

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents adhesive tape
Weight: 0.85
, material
Weight: 0.67
, item
Weight: 0.63
, tape
Weight: 0.62
Siblings magnetic tape
Weight: 0.37
, scotch tape
Weight: 0.36
, tape dispenser
Weight: 0.36
, raw material
Weight: 0.35
, tape measure
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at cabinet 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.18
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(tape, be at cabinet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(duct tape, be at cabinet)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(duct tape, be at cabinet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(tape, be at cabinet)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.52
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(duct tape, be at cabinet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(tape, be at cabinet)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(duct tape, be at cabinet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(scotch tape, be at cabinet)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(tape, be at cabinet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(duct tape, be at cabinet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(duct tape, be at cabinet)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(duct tape, be at cabinet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(scotch tape, be at cabinet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(scotch tape, be at cabinet)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(duct tape, be at cabinet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(duct tape, be at cabinet)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(duct tape, be at cabinet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(duct tape, be at cabinet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(duct tape, be at cabinet)

Typical implies Plausible

0.12
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(duct tape, be at cabinet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(duct tape, be at cabinet)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(duct tape, be at cabinet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(tape, be at cabinet)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(duct tape, be at cabinet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(scotch tape, be at cabinet)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(duct tape, be at cabinet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(tape, be at cabinet)