scotch tape: be at cabinet

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tape
Weight: 0.75
, item
Weight: 0.63
, thing
Weight: 0.62
, product
Weight: 0.62
, material
Weight: 0.58
Siblings adhesive tape
Weight: 0.38
, magnetic tape
Weight: 0.37
, duct tape
Weight: 0.36
, scotch
Weight: 0.36
, tape dispenser
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at cabinet 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(thing, be at cabinet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(scotch tape, be at cabinet)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(tape, be at cabinet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(scotch tape, be at cabinet)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(scotch tape, be at cabinet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(tape, be at cabinet)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(scotch tape, be at cabinet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(thing, be at cabinet)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.52
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(scotch tape, be at cabinet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(tape, be at cabinet)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(scotch tape, be at cabinet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(thing, be at cabinet)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(scotch tape, be at cabinet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(duct tape, be at cabinet)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(thing, be at cabinet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(scotch tape, be at cabinet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(scotch tape, be at cabinet)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(tape, be at cabinet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(scotch tape, be at cabinet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(scotch tape, be at cabinet)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(scotch tape, be at cabinet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(duct tape, be at cabinet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(duct tape, be at cabinet)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(scotch tape, be at cabinet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(scotch tape, be at cabinet)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(scotch tape, be at cabinet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(scotch tape, be at cabinet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(scotch tape, be at cabinet)

Typical implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(scotch tape, be at cabinet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(scotch tape, be at cabinet)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(scotch tape, be at cabinet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(thing, be at cabinet)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(scotch tape, be at cabinet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(tape, be at cabinet)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(scotch tape, be at cabinet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(duct tape, be at cabinet)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(scotch tape, be at cabinet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(thing, be at cabinet)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(scotch tape, be at cabinet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(tape, be at cabinet)