dummy: have in hole

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents stuff
Weight: 0.52
, book
Weight: 0.49
, thing
Weight: 0.47
, robot
Weight: 0.46
, comforter
Weight: 0.46
Siblings moby dick
Weight: 0.30
, decoy
Weight: 0.30
, trick
Weight: 0.30
, flip flop
Weight: 0.29
, puppet
Weight: 0.29

Related properties

Property Similarity
have in hole 1.00
has physical part hole 0.92
have holes in them 0.89
has physical part holes 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(dummy, have in hole) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(dummy, have in hole)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(dummy, have in hole) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(dummy, has physical part hole)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(dummy, have in hole) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(dummy, have holes in them)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(dummy, have in hole) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(dummy, has physical part holes)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(dummy, have in hole) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(dummy, has physical part hole)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(dummy, have in hole) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(dummy, has physical part holes)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(dummy, have in hole) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(dummy, have holes in them)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(dummy, have in hole) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(dummy, has physical part hole)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(dummy, have in hole) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(dummy, has physical part holes)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(dummy, have in hole) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(dummy, have holes in them)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(dummy, have in hole) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(dummy, has physical part holes)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(dummy, have in hole) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(dummy, has physical part hole)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(dummy, have in hole) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(dummy, have holes in them)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(dummy, have in hole) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(dummy, have in hole) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(dummy, have in hole)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(dummy, have in hole) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(dummy, have in hole)