dust: be needed clouds form

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents aerosol
Weight: 0.65
, air pollution
Weight: 0.65
, particle
Weight: 0.62
, matter
Weight: 0.61
Siblings flue
Weight: 0.45
, alpha particle
Weight: 0.34
, carbon dioxide
Weight: 0.34
, smog
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be needed clouds form 1.00
be important in cloud formation 0.84
form 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(aerosol, be important in cloud formation)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(dust, be needed clouds form)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(matter, form)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(dust, be needed clouds form)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(particle, form)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(dust, be needed clouds form)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(dust, be needed clouds form)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(particle, form)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(dust, be needed clouds form)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(matter, form)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(dust, be needed clouds form)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(aerosol, be important in cloud formation)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(dust, be needed clouds form)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(aerosol, be important in cloud formation)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(dust, be needed clouds form)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(particle, form)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(dust, be needed clouds form)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(matter, form)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(dust, be needed clouds form)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(smog, form)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(aerosol, be important in cloud formation)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(dust, be needed clouds form)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(dust, be needed clouds form)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(matter, form)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(dust, be needed clouds form)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(dust, be needed clouds form)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(particle, form)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(dust, be needed clouds form)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(dust, be needed clouds form)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(dust, be needed clouds form)
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(smog, form)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(smog, form)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(dust, be needed clouds form)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(dust, be needed clouds form)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(dust, be needed clouds form)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(dust, be important in cloud formation)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(dust, be needed clouds form)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(dust, form)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(dust, be needed clouds form)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(dust, form)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(dust, be needed clouds form)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(dust, form)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(dust, be needed clouds form)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(dust, be important in cloud formation)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(dust, be needed clouds form)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(dust, form)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(dust, be needed clouds form)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(dust, be important in cloud formation)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(dust, be needed clouds form)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(dust, be important in cloud formation)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(dust, be needed clouds form)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(dust, be needed clouds form)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(dust, be needed clouds form)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(dust, be needed clouds form)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(dust, be needed clouds form)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(dust, be needed clouds form)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(matter, form)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(dust, be needed clouds form)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(particle, form)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(dust, be needed clouds form)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(aerosol, be important in cloud formation)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(dust, be needed clouds form)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(smog, form)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(dust, be needed clouds form)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(matter, form)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(dust, be needed clouds form)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(particle, form)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(dust, be needed clouds form)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(aerosol, be important in cloud formation)