duty: is funny

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents expectation
Weight: 0.63
, consideration
Weight: 0.59
, order
Weight: 0.58
, concept
Weight: 0.58
, factor
Weight: 0.58
Siblings code
Weight: 0.61
, preparation
Weight: 0.59
, promotion
Weight: 0.57
, privilege
Weight: 0.31
, burden
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
is funny 1.00
is funny word 0.90
is boring 0.77
be explained in silly ways 0.77
call of is fun 0.76
is bad thing 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(concept, be explained in silly ways) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(duty, is funny)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(expectation, is boring) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(duty, is funny)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(duty, is funny) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(expectation, is boring)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(duty, is funny) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(concept, be explained in silly ways)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(duty, is funny) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(expectation, is boring)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(duty, is funny) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(concept, be explained in silly ways)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(duty, is funny) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(privilege, is bad thing)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(concept, be explained in silly ways) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(duty, is funny) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(duty, is funny)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(expectation, is boring) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(duty, is funny) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(duty, is funny)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(duty, is funny) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(privilege, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(privilege, is bad thing)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(duty, is funny) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(duty, is funny)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(duty, is funny) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(duty, is funny word)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(duty, is funny) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(duty, is funny word)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(duty, is funny) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(duty, is funny word)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(duty, is funny) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(duty, is funny word)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(duty, is funny) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(duty, call of is fun)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(duty, is funny) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(duty, call of is fun)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(duty, is funny) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(duty, call of is fun)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(duty, is funny) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(duty, call of is fun)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(duty, is funny) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(duty, is funny) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(duty, is funny)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(duty, is funny) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(duty, is funny)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(duty, is funny) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(expectation, is boring)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(duty, is funny) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(concept, be explained in silly ways)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(duty, is funny) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(privilege, is bad thing)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(duty, is funny) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(expectation, is boring)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(duty, is funny) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(concept, be explained in silly ways)