eat: be at restaurant

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents time
Weight: 0.53
, food
Weight: 0.52
, thing
Weight: 0.51
, place
Weight: 0.50
, day
Weight: 0.50
Siblings pet food
Weight: 0.34
, junk food
Weight: 0.34
, fast food
Weight: 0.34
, fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.33
, fresh food
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at fast-food restaurant 1.00
be at restaurant 1.00
be at in restaurant 0.99
be find in restaurant 0.94
be do in restaurant 0.94
be at fast food restaurant 0.90
be serve at restaurant 0.89
be serve in restaurant 0.89
be at chain restaurant 0.88
be at resturant 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(food, be at fast-food restaurant)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(eat, be at restaurant)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(food, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(eat, be at restaurant)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(food, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(eat, be at restaurant)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(food, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(eat, be at restaurant)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(food, be serve in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(eat, be at restaurant)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(food, be at resturant)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(eat, be at restaurant)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(eat, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(food, be at resturant)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(eat, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(food, be at restaurant)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(eat, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(food, be at restaurant)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(eat, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(food, be at fast-food restaurant)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(eat, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(food, be at in restaurant)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(eat, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(food, be serve in restaurant)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(eat, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(food, be at resturant)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(eat, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(food, be at in restaurant)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(eat, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(food, be at restaurant)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(eat, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(food, be at restaurant)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(eat, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(food, be serve in restaurant)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(eat, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(food, be at fast-food restaurant)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(eat, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be at chain restaurant)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(eat, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be at fast-food restaurant)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(eat, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be at fast-food restaurant)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(eat, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be at fast food restaurant)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(food, be at fast-food restaurant)
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(eat, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(eat, be at restaurant)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(food, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(eat, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(eat, be at restaurant)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(food, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(eat, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(eat, be at restaurant)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(food, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(eat, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(eat, be at restaurant)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(food, be serve in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(eat, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(eat, be at restaurant)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(food, be at resturant)
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(eat, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(eat, be at restaurant)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(eat, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(fast food, be at fast-food restaurant)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(fast food, be at fast-food restaurant)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(eat, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(junk food, be at fast-food restaurant)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(junk food, be at fast-food restaurant)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(eat, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(fast food, be at fast food restaurant)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(fast food, be at fast food restaurant)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(eat, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(fast food, be at chain restaurant)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(fast food, be at chain restaurant)

Salient implies Plausible

0.15
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(eat, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(eat, be at restaurant)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(eat, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(eat, be do in restaurant)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(eat, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(eat, be do in restaurant)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(eat, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(eat, be do in restaurant)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(eat, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(eat, be do in restaurant)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(eat, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(eat, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(eat, be at restaurant)

Typical implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(eat, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(eat, be at restaurant)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(eat, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(food, be at fast-food restaurant)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(eat, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(food, be at in restaurant)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(eat, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(food, be at restaurant)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(eat, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(food, be at restaurant)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(eat, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(food, be serve in restaurant)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(eat, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(food, be at resturant)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(eat, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(fast food, be at fast-food restaurant)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(eat, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(junk food, be at fast-food restaurant)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(eat, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(fast food, be at fast food restaurant)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(eat, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(fast food, be at chain restaurant)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(eat, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(food, be at fast-food restaurant)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(eat, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(food, be at in restaurant)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(eat, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(food, be at restaurant)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(eat, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(food, be at restaurant)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(eat, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(food, be serve in restaurant)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(eat, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(food, be at resturant)