echidna: have small eyes

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.53
, mammal
Weight: 0.52
, species
Weight: 0.52
, monotreme
Weight: 0.51
, wildlife
Weight: 0.42
Siblings lizard
Weight: 0.35
, crocodile
Weight: 0.34
, otter
Weight: 0.34
, tree frog
Weight: 0.34
, kangaroo rat
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
have small eyes 1.00
have tiny eyes 0.94
has physical part eyes 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(echidna, have small eyes)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(crocodile, has physical part eyes)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(echidna, have small eyes)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(tree frog, has physical part eyes)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(echidna, have small eyes)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(kangaroo rat, has physical part eyes)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(echidna, have small eyes)
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(crocodile, has physical part eyes)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(crocodile, has physical part eyes)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(echidna, have small eyes)
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(tree frog, has physical part eyes)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(tree frog, has physical part eyes)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(echidna, have small eyes)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(kangaroo rat, has physical part eyes)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(kangaroo rat, has physical part eyes)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(echidna, have small eyes)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(echidna, have small eyes)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(echidna, have small eyes)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(echidna, have tiny eyes)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(echidna, have small eyes)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(echidna, have tiny eyes)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(echidna, have small eyes)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(echidna, have tiny eyes)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(echidna, have small eyes)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(echidna, has physical part eyes)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(echidna, have small eyes)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(echidna, have tiny eyes)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(echidna, have small eyes)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(echidna, has physical part eyes)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(echidna, have small eyes)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(echidna, has physical part eyes)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(echidna, have small eyes)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(echidna, has physical part eyes)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(echidna, have small eyes)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(echidna, have small eyes)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(echidna, have small eyes)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(echidna, have small eyes)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(echidna, have small eyes)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(echidna, have small eyes)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(crocodile, has physical part eyes)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(echidna, have small eyes)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(tree frog, has physical part eyes)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(echidna, have small eyes)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(kangaroo rat, has physical part eyes)