echidna: has physical part eyes

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.53
, mammal
Weight: 0.52
, species
Weight: 0.52
, monotreme
Weight: 0.51
, wildlife
Weight: 0.42
Siblings lizard
Weight: 0.35
, crocodile
Weight: 0.34
, otter
Weight: 0.34
, tree frog
Weight: 0.34
, kangaroo rat
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part eyes 1.00
have small eyes 0.84
has physical part claws 0.81
has physical part tongue 0.81
have tiny eyes 0.80
has physical part feet 0.80
has physical part tongues 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(echidna, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(crocodile, has physical part eyes)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(echidna, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(tree frog, has physical part eyes)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(echidna, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(kangaroo rat, has physical part eyes)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(echidna, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(tree frog, has physical part feet)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(echidna, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(crocodile, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(crocodile, has physical part eyes)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(echidna, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(tree frog, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(tree frog, has physical part eyes)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(echidna, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(kangaroo rat, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(kangaroo rat, has physical part eyes)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(echidna, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(tree frog, has physical part feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(tree frog, has physical part feet)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(echidna, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(echidna, has physical part eyes)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(echidna, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(echidna, have small eyes)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(echidna, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(echidna, has physical part tongue)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(echidna, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(echidna, has physical part tongue)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(echidna, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(echidna, has physical part tongues)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(echidna, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(echidna, has physical part claws)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(echidna, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(echidna, has physical part feet)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(echidna, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(echidna, have tiny eyes)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(echidna, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(echidna, has physical part tongue)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(echidna, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(echidna, has physical part tongue)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(echidna, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(echidna, has physical part tongues)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(echidna, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(echidna, has physical part claws)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(echidna, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(echidna, has physical part claws)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(echidna, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(echidna, has physical part feet)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(echidna, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(echidna, has physical part tongues)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(echidna, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(echidna, has physical part tongues)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(echidna, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(echidna, has physical part claws)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(echidna, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(echidna, has physical part feet)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(echidna, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(echidna, have tiny eyes)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(echidna, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(echidna, has physical part feet)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(echidna, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(echidna, have tiny eyes)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(echidna, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(echidna, have small eyes)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(echidna, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(echidna, have small eyes)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(echidna, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(echidna, have tiny eyes)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(echidna, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(echidna, have small eyes)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(echidna, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(echidna, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(echidna, has physical part eyes)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(echidna, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(echidna, has physical part eyes)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(echidna, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(crocodile, has physical part eyes)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(echidna, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(tree frog, has physical part eyes)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(echidna, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(kangaroo rat, has physical part eyes)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(echidna, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(tree frog, has physical part feet)