echidna: has physical part tongue

Related concepts

Parents	creature Weight: 0.53 , mammal Weight: 0.52 , species Weight: 0.52 , monotreme Weight: 0.51 , wildlife Weight: 0.42
Siblings	lizard Weight: 0.35 , crocodile Weight: 0.34 , otter Weight: 0.34 , tree frog Weight: 0.34 , kangaroo rat Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property	Similarity
has physical part tongue	1.00
have long tongue	0.93
has physical part tongues	0.91
has physical part eyes	0.81
have long tongues	0.80
has physical part claws	0.80
has physical part feet	0.76
has physical part spines	0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Remarkable(echidna, has physical part tongue) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Remarkable(crocodile, has physical part eyes)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Remarkable(echidna, has physical part tongue) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Remarkable(tree frog, has physical part eyes)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Remarkable(echidna, has physical part tongue) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Remarkable(kangaroo rat, has physical part eyes)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Remarkable(echidna, has physical part tongue) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Remarkable(tree frog, has physical part feet)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.37

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.11

Plausible(echidna, has physical part tongue) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

Remarkable(crocodile, has physical part eyes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Plausible(crocodile, has physical part eyes)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.11

Plausible(echidna, has physical part tongue) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

Remarkable(tree frog, has physical part eyes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Plausible(tree frog, has physical part eyes)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.11

Plausible(echidna, has physical part tongue) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

Remarkable(kangaroo rat, has physical part eyes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Plausible(kangaroo rat, has physical part eyes)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.11

Plausible(echidna, has physical part tongue) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

Remarkable(tree frog, has physical part feet) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Plausible(tree frog, has physical part feet)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.11

Plausible(echidna, has physical part tongue) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Salient(echidna, has physical part tongue)

Similarity expansion

0.72

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.10

Typical(echidna, has physical part tongue) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Typical(echidna, has physical part tongues)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.51

Remarkable(echidna, has physical part tongue) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Remarkable(echidna, have long tongue)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.11

Plausible(echidna, has physical part tongue) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Plausible(echidna, has physical part tongues)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.23

Salient(echidna, has physical part tongue) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Salient(echidna, have long tongue)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.10

Typical(echidna, has physical part tongue) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Typical(echidna, has physical part claws)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.10

Typical(echidna, has physical part tongue) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Typical(echidna, has physical part feet)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.10

Typical(echidna, has physical part tongue) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Typical(echidna, has physical part spines)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.11

Plausible(echidna, has physical part tongue) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Plausible(echidna, have long tongue)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.23

Salient(echidna, has physical part tongue) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Salient(echidna, has physical part tongues)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.11

Plausible(echidna, has physical part tongue) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Plausible(echidna, has physical part claws)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.51

Remarkable(echidna, has physical part tongue) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Remarkable(echidna, have long tongues)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.11

Plausible(echidna, has physical part tongue) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Plausible(echidna, has physical part spines)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.10

Typical(echidna, has physical part tongue) ⋁

Evidence: 0.28

¬ Typical(echidna, has physical part eyes)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.11

Plausible(echidna, has physical part tongue) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Plausible(echidna, has physical part feet)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.23

Salient(echidna, has physical part tongue) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Salient(echidna, has physical part claws)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.10

Typical(echidna, has physical part tongue) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Typical(echidna, have long tongue)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.51

Remarkable(echidna, has physical part tongue) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(echidna, has physical part tongues)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.23

Salient(echidna, has physical part tongue) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Salient(echidna, has physical part spines)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.11

Plausible(echidna, has physical part tongue) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Plausible(echidna, has physical part eyes)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.23

Salient(echidna, has physical part tongue) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Salient(echidna, have long tongues)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.51

Remarkable(echidna, has physical part tongue) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Remarkable(echidna, has physical part eyes)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.23

Salient(echidna, has physical part tongue) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Salient(echidna, has physical part feet)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.23

Salient(echidna, has physical part tongue) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Salient(echidna, has physical part eyes)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.51

Remarkable(echidna, has physical part tongue) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(echidna, has physical part claws)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.51

Remarkable(echidna, has physical part tongue) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(echidna, has physical part spines)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.11

Plausible(echidna, has physical part tongue) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Plausible(echidna, have long tongues)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.51

Remarkable(echidna, has physical part tongue) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Remarkable(echidna, has physical part feet)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.10

Typical(echidna, has physical part tongue) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Typical(echidna, have long tongues)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.23

Salient(echidna, has physical part tongue) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Typical(echidna, has physical part tongue) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Remarkable(echidna, has physical part tongue)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.11

Plausible(echidna, has physical part tongue) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Typical(echidna, has physical part tongue)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Remarkable(echidna, has physical part tongue) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Typical(crocodile, has physical part eyes)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Remarkable(echidna, has physical part tongue) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Typical(tree frog, has physical part eyes)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Remarkable(echidna, has physical part tongue) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Typical(tree frog, has physical part feet)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Remarkable(echidna, has physical part tongue) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Typical(kangaroo rat, has physical part eyes)