echidna: have long tongue

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.53
, mammal
Weight: 0.52
, species
Weight: 0.52
, monotreme
Weight: 0.51
, wildlife
Weight: 0.42
Siblings lizard
Weight: 0.35
, crocodile
Weight: 0.34
, otter
Weight: 0.34
, tree frog
Weight: 0.34
, kangaroo rat
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
have long tongue 1.00
has physical part tongue 0.93
have long tongues 0.89
has physical part tongues 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(echidna, have long tongue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(echidna, have long tongue)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(echidna, have long tongue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(echidna, has physical part tongue)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(echidna, have long tongue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(echidna, has physical part tongue)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(echidna, have long tongue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(echidna, has physical part tongues)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(echidna, have long tongue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(echidna, has physical part tongue)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(echidna, have long tongue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(echidna, has physical part tongues)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(echidna, have long tongue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(echidna, has physical part tongues)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(echidna, have long tongue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(echidna, have long tongues)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(echidna, have long tongue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(echidna, has physical part tongue)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(echidna, have long tongue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(echidna, have long tongues)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(echidna, have long tongue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(echidna, have long tongues)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(echidna, have long tongue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(echidna, have long tongues)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(echidna, have long tongue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(echidna, has physical part tongues)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(echidna, have long tongue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(echidna, have long tongue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(echidna, have long tongue)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(echidna, have long tongue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(echidna, have long tongue)