echidna: has physical part tongues

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.53
, mammal
Weight: 0.52
, species
Weight: 0.52
, monotreme
Weight: 0.51
, wildlife
Weight: 0.42
Siblings lizard
Weight: 0.35
, crocodile
Weight: 0.34
, otter
Weight: 0.34
, tree frog
Weight: 0.34
, kangaroo rat
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part tongues 1.00
have long tongues 0.93
has physical part tongue 0.91
have long tongue 0.85
has physical part eyes 0.79
has physical part claws 0.79
has physical part spines 0.77
has physical part snouts 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(echidna, has physical part tongues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(crocodile, has physical part eyes)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(echidna, has physical part tongues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(tree frog, has physical part eyes)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(echidna, has physical part tongues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(kangaroo rat, has physical part eyes)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(echidna, has physical part tongues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(crocodile, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(crocodile, has physical part eyes)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(echidna, has physical part tongues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(tree frog, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(tree frog, has physical part eyes)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(echidna, has physical part tongues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(kangaroo rat, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(kangaroo rat, has physical part eyes)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(echidna, has physical part tongues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(echidna, has physical part tongues)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(echidna, has physical part tongues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(echidna, have long tongues)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(echidna, has physical part tongues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(echidna, has physical part tongue)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(echidna, has physical part tongues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(echidna, has physical part tongue)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(echidna, has physical part tongues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(echidna, has physical part tongue)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(echidna, has physical part tongues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(echidna, have long tongue)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(echidna, has physical part tongues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(echidna, has physical part tongue)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(echidna, has physical part tongues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(echidna, has physical part claws)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(echidna, has physical part tongues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(echidna, has physical part spines)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(echidna, has physical part tongues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(echidna, have long tongue)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(echidna, has physical part tongues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(echidna, has physical part eyes)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(echidna, has physical part tongues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(echidna, has physical part claws)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(echidna, has physical part tongues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(echidna, has physical part snouts)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(echidna, has physical part tongues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(echidna, have long tongue)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(echidna, has physical part tongues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(echidna, has physical part claws)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(echidna, has physical part tongues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(echidna, has physical part spines)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(echidna, has physical part tongues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(echidna, has physical part spines)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(echidna, has physical part tongues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(echidna, have long tongues)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(echidna, has physical part tongues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(echidna, has physical part claws)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(echidna, has physical part tongues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(echidna, has physical part eyes)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(echidna, has physical part tongues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(echidna, has physical part spines)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(echidna, has physical part tongues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(echidna, has physical part snouts)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(echidna, has physical part tongues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(echidna, has physical part snouts)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(echidna, has physical part tongues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(echidna, has physical part snouts)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(echidna, has physical part tongues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(echidna, has physical part eyes)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(echidna, has physical part tongues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(echidna, have long tongues)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(echidna, has physical part tongues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(echidna, has physical part eyes)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(echidna, has physical part tongues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(echidna, have long tongue)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(echidna, has physical part tongues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(echidna, have long tongues)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(echidna, has physical part tongues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(echidna, has physical part tongues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(echidna, has physical part tongues)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(echidna, has physical part tongues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(echidna, has physical part tongues)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(echidna, has physical part tongues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(crocodile, has physical part eyes)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(echidna, has physical part tongues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(tree frog, has physical part eyes)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(echidna, has physical part tongues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(kangaroo rat, has physical part eyes)