echidna: has physical part spines

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.53
, mammal
Weight: 0.52
, species
Weight: 0.52
, monotreme
Weight: 0.51
, wildlife
Weight: 0.42
Siblings lizard
Weight: 0.35
, crocodile
Weight: 0.34
, otter
Weight: 0.34
, tree frog
Weight: 0.34
, kangaroo rat
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part spines 1.00
has physical part claws 0.78
has physical part tongues 0.77
has physical part tongue 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(echidna, has physical part spines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(echidna, has physical part spines)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(echidna, has physical part spines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(echidna, has physical part tongues)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(echidna, has physical part spines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(echidna, has physical part claws)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(echidna, has physical part spines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(echidna, has physical part tongue)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(echidna, has physical part spines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(echidna, has physical part tongue)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(echidna, has physical part spines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(echidna, has physical part tongue)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(echidna, has physical part spines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(echidna, has physical part tongues)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(echidna, has physical part spines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(echidna, has physical part claws)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(echidna, has physical part spines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(echidna, has physical part tongues)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(echidna, has physical part spines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(echidna, has physical part claws)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(echidna, has physical part spines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(echidna, has physical part tongue)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(echidna, has physical part spines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(echidna, has physical part tongues)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(echidna, has physical part spines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(echidna, has physical part claws)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(echidna, has physical part spines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(echidna, has physical part spines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(echidna, has physical part spines)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(echidna, has physical part spines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(echidna, has physical part spines)