echinoderm: be classified as deuterostomes

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal
Weight: 0.66
, organism
Weight: 0.53
, invertebrate
Weight: 0.51
, species
Weight: 0.47
, fish
Weight: 0.47
Siblings starfish
Weight: 0.68
, sea cucumber
Weight: 0.64
, sea otter
Weight: 0.36
, cassowary
Weight: 0.35
, mollusk
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be classified as deuterostomes 1.00
be classified as animals 0.87
be classified into phylum chordata 0.87
is deuterostomes 0.85
be considered related to chordates 0.81
be related to chordates 0.78
be considered closely related to chordates 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(echinoderm, be classified as deuterostomes)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(mollusk, be classified as animals)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(echinoderm, be classified as deuterostomes)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(mollusk, be classified as animals)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(mollusk, be classified as animals)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(echinoderm, be classified as deuterostomes)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(echinoderm, be classified as deuterostomes)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(echinoderm, be classified as deuterostomes)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(echinoderm, is deuterostomes)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(echinoderm, be classified as deuterostomes)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(echinoderm, is deuterostomes)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(echinoderm, be classified as deuterostomes)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(echinoderm, is deuterostomes)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(echinoderm, be classified as deuterostomes)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(echinoderm, be classified into phylum chordata)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(echinoderm, be classified as deuterostomes)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(echinoderm, be classified as animals)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(echinoderm, be classified as deuterostomes)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(echinoderm, be classified into phylum chordata)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(echinoderm, be classified as deuterostomes)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(echinoderm, be classified as animals)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(echinoderm, be classified as deuterostomes)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(echinoderm, be classified into phylum chordata)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(echinoderm, be classified as deuterostomes)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(echinoderm, be classified into phylum chordata)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(echinoderm, be classified as deuterostomes)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(echinoderm, be classified as animals)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(echinoderm, be classified as deuterostomes)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(echinoderm, be classified as animals)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(echinoderm, be classified as deuterostomes)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(echinoderm, be considered related to chordates)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(echinoderm, be classified as deuterostomes)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(echinoderm, be considered related to chordates)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(echinoderm, be classified as deuterostomes)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(echinoderm, be related to chordates)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(echinoderm, be classified as deuterostomes)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(echinoderm, be related to chordates)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(echinoderm, be classified as deuterostomes)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(echinoderm, be considered closely related to chordates)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(echinoderm, be classified as deuterostomes)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(echinoderm, be considered closely related to chordates)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(echinoderm, be classified as deuterostomes)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(echinoderm, be considered related to chordates)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(echinoderm, be classified as deuterostomes)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(echinoderm, be related to chordates)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(echinoderm, be classified as deuterostomes)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(echinoderm, be related to chordates)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(echinoderm, be classified as deuterostomes)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(echinoderm, be considered closely related to chordates)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(echinoderm, be classified as deuterostomes)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(echinoderm, be considered related to chordates)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(echinoderm, be classified as deuterostomes)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(echinoderm, be considered closely related to chordates)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(echinoderm, be classified as deuterostomes)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(echinoderm, is deuterostomes)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(echinoderm, be classified as deuterostomes)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(echinoderm, be classified as deuterostomes)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(echinoderm, be classified as deuterostomes)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(echinoderm, be classified as deuterostomes)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(echinoderm, be classified as deuterostomes)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(echinoderm, be classified as deuterostomes)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(mollusk, be classified as animals)