ecology: is interesting

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents science
Weight: 0.65
, project
Weight: 0.60
, issue
Weight: 0.60
, subject
Weight: 0.58
, thing
Weight: 0.58
Siblings biology
Weight: 0.36
, computer science
Weight: 0.36
, meteorology
Weight: 0.35
, biodiversity
Weight: 0.34
, agriculture
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is interesting 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(ecology, is interesting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(computer science, is interesting)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(ecology, is interesting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(meteorology, is interesting)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(ecology, is interesting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(biology, is interesting)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(ecology, is interesting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(biology, is interesting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(biology, is interesting)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(ecology, is interesting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(meteorology, is interesting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(meteorology, is interesting)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(ecology, is interesting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(computer science, is interesting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(computer science, is interesting)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(ecology, is interesting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(ecology, is interesting)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(ecology, is interesting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(ecology, is interesting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(ecology, is interesting)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(ecology, is interesting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(ecology, is interesting)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(ecology, is interesting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(meteorology, is interesting)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(ecology, is interesting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(biology, is interesting)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(ecology, is interesting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(computer science, is interesting)