ecosystem: be important to environment

Related concepts

Parents	environment Weight: 0.59 , concept Weight: 0.57 , thing Weight: 0.57 , topic Weight: 0.55
Siblings	wetland Weight: 0.73 , coral reef Weight: 0.67 , estuary Weight: 0.66 , fish Weight: 0.65 , ocean Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be important to environment	1.00
be important to us	0.77
be important for us	0.77
be dynamic in nature	0.76
relate to climate change	0.76
be related to climate zones	0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(environment, be important for us) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Typical(ecosystem, be important to environment)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.40

Plausible(ecosystem, be important to environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Plausible(environment, be important for us)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.17

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Remarkable(ecosystem, be important to environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(environment, be important for us)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Remarkable(ecosystem, be important to environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Remarkable(estuary, be important to environment)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(environment, be important for us) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

Remarkable(ecosystem, be important to environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Plausible(ecosystem, be important to environment)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.40

Plausible(ecosystem, be important to environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

Remarkable(estuary, be important to environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Plausible(estuary, be important to environment)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.40

Plausible(ecosystem, be important to environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Salient(ecosystem, be important to environment)

Similarity expansion

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.95

Remarkable(ecosystem, be important to environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(ecosystem, be important for us)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.95

Remarkable(ecosystem, be important to environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Remarkable(ecosystem, be important to us)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.95

Remarkable(ecosystem, be important to environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Remarkable(ecosystem, be dynamic in nature)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.95

Remarkable(ecosystem, be important to environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Remarkable(ecosystem, relate to climate change)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.95

Remarkable(ecosystem, be important to environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Remarkable(ecosystem, be related to climate zones)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.17

Typical(ecosystem, be important to environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Typical(ecosystem, relate to climate change)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.17

Typical(ecosystem, be important to environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Typical(ecosystem, be dynamic in nature)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.17

Typical(ecosystem, be important to environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.19

¬ Typical(ecosystem, be related to climate zones)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.68

Salient(ecosystem, be important to environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Salient(ecosystem, be dynamic in nature)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.68

Salient(ecosystem, be important to environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Salient(ecosystem, relate to climate change)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.40

Plausible(ecosystem, be important to environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Plausible(ecosystem, relate to climate change)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.40

Plausible(ecosystem, be important to environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Plausible(ecosystem, be dynamic in nature)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.68

Salient(ecosystem, be important to environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Salient(ecosystem, be related to climate zones)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.68

Salient(ecosystem, be important to environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Salient(ecosystem, be important to us)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.40

Plausible(ecosystem, be important to environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Plausible(ecosystem, be related to climate zones)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.17

Typical(ecosystem, be important to environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Typical(ecosystem, be important to us)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.68

Salient(ecosystem, be important to environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Salient(ecosystem, be important for us)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.40

Plausible(ecosystem, be important to environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Plausible(ecosystem, be important to us)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.40

Plausible(ecosystem, be important to environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Plausible(ecosystem, be important for us)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.17

Typical(ecosystem, be important to environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Typical(ecosystem, be important for us)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.68

Salient(ecosystem, be important to environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Typical(ecosystem, be important to environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Remarkable(ecosystem, be important to environment)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.40

Plausible(ecosystem, be important to environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Typical(ecosystem, be important to environment)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.08

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Remarkable(ecosystem, be important to environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Typical(environment, be important for us)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Remarkable(ecosystem, be important to environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Typical(estuary, be important to environment)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.11

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.17

Typical(ecosystem, be important to environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Typical(environment, be important for us)