eel: be considered fish

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fish
Weight: 0.70
, seafood
Weight: 0.65
, species
Weight: 0.63
, ingredient
Weight: 0.60
, creature
Weight: 0.58
Siblings lamprey
Weight: 0.47
, electric eel
Weight: 0.38
, sturgeon
Weight: 0.38
, koi carp
Weight: 0.38
, rainbow trout
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered fish 1.00
is fish 0.95
sting other fish 0.80
sting fish 0.79
be called electric eels 0.77
live in freshwater 0.77
is bony fish 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(eel, be considered fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(electric eel, is fish)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(eel, be considered fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(electric eel, live in freshwater)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(eel, be considered fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(electric eel, be called electric eels)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(eel, be considered fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(electric eel, is fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(electric eel, is fish)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(eel, be considered fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(electric eel, be called electric eels) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(electric eel, be called electric eels)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(eel, be considered fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(electric eel, live in freshwater) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(electric eel, live in freshwater)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(eel, be considered fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(eel, be considered fish)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(eel, be considered fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(eel, is fish)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(eel, be considered fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(eel, is fish)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(eel, be considered fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(eel, is fish)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(eel, be considered fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(eel, is fish)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(eel, be considered fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(eel, sting other fish)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(eel, be considered fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(eel, sting fish)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(eel, be considered fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(eel, be called electric eels)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(eel, be considered fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(eel, live in freshwater)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(eel, be considered fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(eel, is bony fish)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(eel, be considered fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(eel, sting fish)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(eel, be considered fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(eel, be called electric eels)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(eel, be considered fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(eel, sting fish)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(eel, be considered fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(eel, sting fish)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(eel, be considered fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(eel, sting other fish)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(eel, be considered fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(eel, live in freshwater)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(eel, be considered fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(eel, is bony fish)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(eel, be considered fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(eel, be called electric eels)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(eel, be considered fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(eel, live in freshwater)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(eel, be considered fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(eel, live in freshwater)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(eel, be considered fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(eel, is bony fish)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(eel, be considered fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(eel, be called electric eels)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(eel, be considered fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(eel, sting other fish)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(eel, be considered fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(eel, is bony fish)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(eel, be considered fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(eel, sting other fish)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(eel, be considered fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(eel, be considered fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(eel, be considered fish)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(eel, be considered fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(eel, be considered fish)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(eel, be considered fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(electric eel, is fish)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(eel, be considered fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(electric eel, live in freshwater)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(eel, be considered fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(electric eel, be called electric eels)