eel: sting fish

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fish
Weight: 0.70
, seafood
Weight: 0.65
, species
Weight: 0.63
, ingredient
Weight: 0.60
, creature
Weight: 0.58
Siblings lamprey
Weight: 0.47
, electric eel
Weight: 0.38
, sturgeon
Weight: 0.38
, koi carp
Weight: 0.38
, rainbow trout
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
sting fish 1.00
sting other fish 0.99
is fish 0.83
be considered fish 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(eel, sting fish)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(electric eel, is fish)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(eel, sting fish)
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(electric eel, is fish)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(electric eel, is fish)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(eel, sting fish)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(eel, sting fish)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(eel, sting fish)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(eel, sting other fish)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(eel, sting fish)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(eel, is fish)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(eel, sting fish)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(eel, is fish)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(eel, sting fish)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(eel, is fish)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(eel, sting fish)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(eel, be considered fish)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(eel, sting fish)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(eel, sting other fish)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(eel, sting fish)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(eel, is fish)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(eel, sting fish)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(eel, be considered fish)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(eel, sting fish)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(eel, be considered fish)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(eel, sting fish)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(eel, sting other fish)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(eel, sting fish)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(eel, be considered fish)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(eel, sting fish)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(eel, sting other fish)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(eel, sting fish)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(eel, sting fish)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(eel, sting fish)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(eel, sting fish)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(eel, sting fish)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(eel, sting fish)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(electric eel, is fish)