effect: is expensive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents element
Weight: 0.65
, variable
Weight: 0.64
, greenhouse effect
Weight: 0.62
, aspect
Weight: 0.61
Siblings depth
Weight: 0.62
, rise
Weight: 0.61
, viscosity
Weight: 0.61
, weight
Weight: 0.59
, phase
Weight: 0.59

Related properties

Property Similarity
is expensive 1.00
cost money 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(effect, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(depth, is expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(effect, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(rise, is expensive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(effect, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(rise, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(rise, is expensive)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(effect, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(depth, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(depth, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(effect, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(effect, is expensive)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(effect, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(effect, cost money)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(effect, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(effect, cost money)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(effect, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(effect, cost money)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(effect, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(effect, cost money)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(effect, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(effect, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(effect, is expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(effect, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(effect, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(effect, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(depth, is expensive)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(effect, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(rise, is expensive)