election: be conducted in united kingdom votes

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents general election
Weight: 0.84
, ballot
Weight: 0.69
, event
Weight: 0.62
, process
Weight: 0.61
Siblings primary
Weight: 0.63
, delegate
Weight: 0.54
, midterm
Weight: 0.48
, vote
Weight: 0.34
, national convention
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be conducted in united kingdom votes 1.00
be conducted in kingdom votes 0.96
be conducted through ballot 0.81
be conducted through secret ballot 0.80
be based on votes 0.79
is conducted 0.78
work in united states 0.78
be based on electoral votes 0.77
give votes to candidates 0.77
be distributed in united nations general assembly 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(election, be conducted in united kingdom votes)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(vote, be distributed in united nations general assembly)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(election, be conducted in united kingdom votes)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(delegate, give votes to candidates)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(election, be conducted in united kingdom votes)
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(delegate, give votes to candidates)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(delegate, give votes to candidates)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(election, be conducted in united kingdom votes)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(vote, be distributed in united nations general assembly)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(vote, be distributed in united nations general assembly)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(election, be conducted in united kingdom votes)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(election, be conducted in united kingdom votes)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(election, be conducted in united kingdom votes)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(election, be conducted in united kingdom votes)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(election, be conducted in united kingdom votes)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(election, be conducted in united kingdom votes)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(election, be conducted in united kingdom votes)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(election, be conducted in united kingdom votes)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(delegate, give votes to candidates)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(election, be conducted in united kingdom votes)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(vote, be distributed in united nations general assembly)