election: is needed

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents general election
Weight: 0.84
, ballot
Weight: 0.69
, event
Weight: 0.62
, process
Weight: 0.61
Siblings primary
Weight: 0.63
, delegate
Weight: 0.54
, midterm
Weight: 0.48
, vote
Weight: 0.34
, national convention
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is needed 1.00
is necessary 0.86
be needed win 0.83
be used help 0.79
is more important 0.76
CAN good 0.76
be needed in democracy 0.76
be needed in india 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(process, be used help) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(election, is needed)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(election, is needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(process, be used help)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(election, is needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(process, be used help)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(election, is needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(primary, is more important)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.09
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(election, is needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(delegate, is more important)
0.00
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.03
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(election, is needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(delegate, is necessary)
0.00
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.03
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(election, is needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(vote, be needed win)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(process, be used help) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(election, is needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(election, is needed)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(election, is needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(delegate, is necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(delegate, is necessary)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(election, is needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(vote, be needed win) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(vote, be needed win)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(election, is needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(delegate, is more important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(delegate, is more important)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(election, is needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(primary, is more important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(primary, is more important)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(election, is needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(election, is needed)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(election, is needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(election, is necessary)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(election, is needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(election, is necessary)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(election, is needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(election, be needed in democracy)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(election, is needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(election, be needed in india)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(election, is needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(election, is necessary)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(election, is needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(election, is necessary)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(election, is needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(election, be needed in democracy)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(election, is needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(election, be needed in india)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(election, is needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(election, be needed in india)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(election, is needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(election, be needed in india)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(election, is needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(election, be needed in democracy)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(election, is needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(election, be needed in democracy)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(election, is needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(election, is needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(election, is needed)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(election, is needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(election, is needed)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(election, is needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(process, be used help)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(election, is needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(delegate, is necessary)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(election, is needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(vote, be needed win)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(election, is needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(delegate, is more important)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(election, is needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(primary, is more important)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(election, is needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(process, be used help)