electrician: use scientific notation

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents worker
Weight: 0.66
, mechanic
Weight: 0.64
, construction worker
Weight: 0.63
, craftsman
Weight: 0.60
, job
Weight: 0.58
Siblings machinist
Weight: 0.37
, carpenter
Weight: 0.37
, office worker
Weight: 0.36
, auto mechanic
Weight: 0.36
, janitor
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
use scientific notation 1.00
use notation 0.92
use science 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.29
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(mechanic, use science)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(electrician, use scientific notation)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(electrician, use scientific notation)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(mechanic, use science)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(electrician, use scientific notation)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(mechanic, use science)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(mechanic, use science)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(electrician, use scientific notation)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(electrician, use scientific notation)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(electrician, use scientific notation)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(electrician, use scientific notation)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(electrician, use scientific notation)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(electrician, use notation)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(electrician, use scientific notation)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(electrician, use notation)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(electrician, use scientific notation)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(electrician, use notation)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(electrician, use scientific notation)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(electrician, use notation)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(electrician, use scientific notation)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(electrician, use science)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(electrician, use scientific notation)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(electrician, use science)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(electrician, use scientific notation)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(electrician, use science)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(electrician, use scientific notation)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(electrician, use science)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(electrician, use scientific notation)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(electrician, use scientific notation)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(electrician, use scientific notation)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(electrician, use scientific notation)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(electrician, use scientific notation)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(electrician, use scientific notation)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(mechanic, use science)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(electrician, use scientific notation)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(mechanic, use science)