electrician: use science

Related concepts

Parents	worker Weight: 0.66 , mechanic Weight: 0.64 , construction worker Weight: 0.63 , craftsman Weight: 0.60 , job Weight: 0.58
Siblings	machinist Weight: 0.37 , carpenter Weight: 0.37 , office worker Weight: 0.36 , auto mechanic Weight: 0.36 , janitor Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property	Similarity
use science	1.00
need science	0.94
use physics	0.83
be in atmospheric science	0.81
use math	0.80
use scientific notation	0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.29

Plausible(mechanic, use science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Typical(electrician, use science)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.47

Plausible(mechanic, use math) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Typical(electrician, use science)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.36

Plausible(construction worker, use math) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Typical(electrician, use science)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.53

Plausible(electrician, use science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Plausible(mechanic, use science)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.53

Plausible(electrician, use science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Plausible(construction worker, use math)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.53

Plausible(electrician, use science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Plausible(mechanic, use math)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.32

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(electrician, use science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Remarkable(mechanic, use math)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(electrician, use science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Remarkable(construction worker, use math)

0.20

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(electrician, use science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(mechanic, use science)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(electrician, use science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Remarkable(carpenter, use math)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.29

Plausible(mechanic, use science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

Remarkable(electrician, use science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Plausible(electrician, use science)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.47

Plausible(mechanic, use math) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

Remarkable(electrician, use science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Plausible(electrician, use science)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.36

Plausible(construction worker, use math) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

Remarkable(electrician, use science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Plausible(electrician, use science)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.53

Plausible(electrician, use science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

Remarkable(carpenter, use math) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Plausible(carpenter, use math)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.53

Plausible(electrician, use science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Salient(electrician, use science)

Similarity expansion

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.81

Remarkable(electrician, use science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(electrician, need science)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.81

Remarkable(electrician, use science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Remarkable(electrician, use math)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.70

Salient(electrician, use science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Salient(electrician, use math)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.53

Plausible(electrician, use science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Plausible(electrician, use math)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.70

Salient(electrician, use science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Salient(electrician, need science)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.46

Typical(electrician, use science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Typical(electrician, use physics)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.46

Typical(electrician, use science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Typical(electrician, need science)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.81

Remarkable(electrician, use science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Remarkable(electrician, use physics)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.81

Remarkable(electrician, use science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(electrician, use scientific notation)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.53

Plausible(electrician, use science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Plausible(electrician, need science)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.70

Salient(electrician, use science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Salient(electrician, use physics)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.53

Plausible(electrician, use science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Plausible(electrician, use physics)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.46

Typical(electrician, use science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Typical(electrician, use math)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.70

Salient(electrician, use science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Salient(electrician, use scientific notation)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.53

Plausible(electrician, use science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Plausible(electrician, use scientific notation)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.46

Typical(electrician, use science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Typical(electrician, use scientific notation)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.70

Salient(electrician, use science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Typical(electrician, use science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(electrician, use science)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.53

Plausible(electrician, use science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Typical(electrician, use science)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.44

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(electrician, use science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Typical(mechanic, use science)

0.26

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(electrician, use science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Typical(construction worker, use math)

0.22

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(electrician, use science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Typical(mechanic, use math)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(electrician, use science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Typical(carpenter, use math)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.46

Typical(electrician, use science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Typical(mechanic, use science)

0.29

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.46

Typical(electrician, use science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Typical(construction worker, use math)

0.27

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.46

Typical(electrician, use science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Typical(mechanic, use math)