construction worker: use math

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents worker
Weight: 0.88
, employee
Weight: 0.74
, project
Weight: 0.67
, contractor
Weight: 0.64
Siblings carpenter
Weight: 0.70
, engineer
Weight: 0.65
, roofer
Weight: 0.63
, mason
Weight: 0.63
, electrician
Weight: 0.63

Related properties

Property Similarity
use math 1.00
need math 0.96
use algebra 0.89
need maths 0.83
use geometry 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(contractor, use math)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(construction worker, use math)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(contractor, use algebra)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(construction worker, use math)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(construction worker, use math)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(contractor, use math)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(construction worker, use math)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(contractor, use algebra)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, use math)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(contractor, use algebra)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, use math)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(contractor, use math)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, use math)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(engineer, use math)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, use math)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(electrician, use math)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, use math)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(engineer, need math)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, use math)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(carpenter, use math)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, use math)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(engineer, use algebra)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, use math)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(electrician, use algebra)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, use math)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(carpenter, use algebra)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(contractor, use math)
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(construction worker, use math)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(construction worker, use math)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(contractor, use algebra)
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(construction worker, use math)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(construction worker, use math)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(construction worker, use math)
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(engineer, use math)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(engineer, use math)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(construction worker, use math)
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(electrician, use math)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(electrician, use math)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(construction worker, use math)
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(engineer, need math)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(engineer, need math)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(construction worker, use math)
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(carpenter, use math)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(carpenter, use math)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(construction worker, use math)
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(engineer, use algebra)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(engineer, use algebra)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(construction worker, use math)
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(electrician, use algebra)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(electrician, use algebra)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(construction worker, use math)
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(carpenter, use algebra)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(carpenter, use algebra)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(construction worker, use math)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(construction worker, use math)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(construction worker, use math)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, use algebra)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(construction worker, use math)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(construction worker, use algebra)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(construction worker, use math)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(construction worker, use algebra)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(construction worker, use math)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, need maths)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(construction worker, use math)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(construction worker, need math)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(construction worker, use math)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(construction worker, need maths)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(construction worker, use math)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(construction worker, need math)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(construction worker, use math)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(construction worker, use geometry)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(construction worker, use math)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(construction worker, need math)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(construction worker, use math)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(construction worker, need maths)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(construction worker, use math)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(construction worker, use algebra)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(construction worker, use math)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, need math)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(construction worker, use math)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(construction worker, need maths)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(construction worker, use math)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(construction worker, use geometry)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(construction worker, use math)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(construction worker, use geometry)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(construction worker, use math)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, use geometry)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(construction worker, use math)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(construction worker, use math)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, use math)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(construction worker, use math)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(construction worker, use math)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, use math)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(contractor, use math)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, use math)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(contractor, use algebra)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, use math)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(engineer, use math)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, use math)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(electrician, use math)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, use math)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(carpenter, use math)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, use math)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(engineer, need math)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, use math)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(engineer, use algebra)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, use math)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(electrician, use algebra)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, use math)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(carpenter, use algebra)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(construction worker, use math)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(contractor, use math)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(construction worker, use math)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(contractor, use algebra)