construction worker: use algebra

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents worker
Weight: 0.88
, employee
Weight: 0.74
, project
Weight: 0.67
, contractor
Weight: 0.64
Siblings carpenter
Weight: 0.70
, engineer
Weight: 0.65
, roofer
Weight: 0.63
, mason
Weight: 0.63
, electrician
Weight: 0.63

Related properties

Property Similarity
use algebra 1.00
use math 0.89
need math 0.85
need maths 0.78
use geometry 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(contractor, use algebra)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(construction worker, use algebra)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(contractor, use math)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(construction worker, use algebra)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(construction worker, use algebra)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(contractor, use algebra)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(construction worker, use algebra)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(contractor, use math)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.55
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, use algebra)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(contractor, use algebra)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, use algebra)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(contractor, use math)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, use algebra)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(engineer, use algebra)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, use algebra)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(electrician, use algebra)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, use algebra)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(carpenter, use algebra)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, use algebra)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(engineer, use math)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, use algebra)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(electrician, use math)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, use algebra)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(carpenter, use math)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, use algebra)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(engineer, need math)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(contractor, use algebra)
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(construction worker, use algebra)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(construction worker, use algebra)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(contractor, use math)
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(construction worker, use algebra)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(construction worker, use algebra)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(construction worker, use algebra)
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(engineer, use algebra)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(engineer, use algebra)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(construction worker, use algebra)
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(electrician, use algebra)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(electrician, use algebra)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(construction worker, use algebra)
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(carpenter, use algebra)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(carpenter, use algebra)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(construction worker, use algebra)
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(engineer, use math)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(engineer, use math)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(construction worker, use algebra)
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(electrician, use math)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(electrician, use math)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(construction worker, use algebra)
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(engineer, need math)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(engineer, need math)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(construction worker, use algebra)
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(carpenter, use math)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(carpenter, use math)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(construction worker, use algebra)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(construction worker, use algebra)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(construction worker, use algebra)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(construction worker, use geometry)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(construction worker, use algebra)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(construction worker, use math)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(construction worker, use algebra)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(construction worker, need math)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(construction worker, use algebra)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(construction worker, use math)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(construction worker, use algebra)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(construction worker, use math)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(construction worker, use algebra)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, need maths)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(construction worker, use algebra)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(construction worker, need maths)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(construction worker, use algebra)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, use math)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(construction worker, use algebra)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(construction worker, need maths)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(construction worker, use algebra)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(construction worker, need math)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(construction worker, use algebra)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(construction worker, need maths)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(construction worker, use algebra)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(construction worker, use geometry)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(construction worker, use algebra)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(construction worker, need math)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(construction worker, use algebra)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, need math)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(construction worker, use algebra)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(construction worker, use geometry)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(construction worker, use algebra)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, use geometry)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(construction worker, use algebra)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(construction worker, use algebra)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, use algebra)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(construction worker, use algebra)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(construction worker, use algebra)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, use algebra)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(contractor, use algebra)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, use algebra)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(contractor, use math)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, use algebra)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(engineer, use algebra)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, use algebra)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(electrician, use algebra)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, use algebra)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(carpenter, use algebra)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, use algebra)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(engineer, use math)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, use algebra)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(electrician, use math)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, use algebra)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(carpenter, use math)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, use algebra)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(engineer, need math)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(construction worker, use algebra)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(contractor, use algebra)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(construction worker, use algebra)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(contractor, use math)