contractor: use algebra

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents construction worker
Weight: 0.70
, workman
Weight: 0.63
, professional
Weight: 0.61
, employee
Weight: 0.61
Siblings architect
Weight: 0.71
, engineer
Weight: 0.65
, builder
Weight: 0.63
, plumber
Weight: 0.63
, agent
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
use algebra 1.00
use math 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(construction worker, use math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(contractor, use algebra)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(construction worker, use algebra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(contractor, use algebra)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(contractor, use algebra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(construction worker, use algebra)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(contractor, use algebra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(construction worker, use math)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.55
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(contractor, use algebra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, use algebra)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(contractor, use algebra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, use math)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(contractor, use algebra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(architect, use algebra)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(contractor, use algebra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(engineer, use algebra)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(contractor, use algebra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(builder, use algebra)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(contractor, use algebra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(engineer, use math)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(contractor, use algebra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(architect, use math)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(construction worker, use algebra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(contractor, use algebra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(contractor, use algebra)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(construction worker, use math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(contractor, use algebra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(contractor, use algebra)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(contractor, use algebra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(architect, use algebra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(architect, use algebra)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(contractor, use algebra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(engineer, use algebra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(engineer, use algebra)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(contractor, use algebra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(builder, use algebra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(builder, use algebra)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(contractor, use algebra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(engineer, use math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(engineer, use math)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(contractor, use algebra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(architect, use math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(architect, use math)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(contractor, use algebra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(contractor, use algebra)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(contractor, use algebra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(contractor, use math)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(contractor, use algebra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(contractor, use math)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(contractor, use algebra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(contractor, use math)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(contractor, use algebra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(contractor, use math)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(contractor, use algebra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(contractor, use algebra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(contractor, use algebra)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(contractor, use algebra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(contractor, use algebra)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(contractor, use algebra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(construction worker, use algebra)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(contractor, use algebra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(construction worker, use math)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(contractor, use algebra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(architect, use algebra)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(contractor, use algebra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(engineer, use algebra)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(contractor, use algebra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(builder, use algebra)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(contractor, use algebra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(architect, use math)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(contractor, use algebra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(engineer, use math)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(contractor, use algebra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(construction worker, use algebra)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(contractor, use algebra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(construction worker, use math)