engineer: use math

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents scientist
Weight: 0.70
, expert
Weight: 0.65
, contractor
Weight: 0.65
, construction worker
Weight: 0.65
, employee
Weight: 0.65
Siblings physicist
Weight: 0.57
, james watt
Weight: 0.54
, geologist
Weight: 0.37
, architect
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
use math 1.00
need math 0.96
know math 0.94
need much math 0.93
have good at math 0.92
use math in jobs 0.91
need mathematics 0.89
use algebra 0.89
use maths 0.85
use trigonometry 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(contractor, use math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(engineer, use math)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(construction worker, use math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(engineer, use math)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(construction worker, need math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(engineer, use math)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(contractor, use algebra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(engineer, use math)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(construction worker, use algebra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(engineer, use math)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(engineer, use math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(construction worker, use algebra)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(engineer, use math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(construction worker, use math)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(engineer, use math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(construction worker, need math)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(engineer, use math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(contractor, use math)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(engineer, use math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(contractor, use algebra)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.56
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(engineer, use math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, use math)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(engineer, use math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(contractor, use math)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(engineer, use math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, need math)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(engineer, use math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, use algebra)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(engineer, use math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(contractor, use algebra)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(engineer, use math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(architect, use math)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(engineer, use math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(physicist, use math)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(engineer, use math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(architect, need math)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(engineer, use math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(architect, know math)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(engineer, use math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(architect, use algebra)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(engineer, use math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(architect, use trigonometry)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(engineer, use math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(physicist, use trigonometry)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(contractor, use math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(engineer, use math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(engineer, use math)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(construction worker, use math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(engineer, use math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(engineer, use math)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(construction worker, need math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(engineer, use math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(engineer, use math)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(contractor, use algebra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(engineer, use math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(engineer, use math)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(construction worker, use algebra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(engineer, use math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(engineer, use math)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(engineer, use math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(architect, use math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(architect, use math)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(engineer, use math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(physicist, use math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(physicist, use math)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(engineer, use math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(architect, use algebra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(architect, use algebra)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(engineer, use math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(architect, need math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(architect, need math)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(engineer, use math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(physicist, use trigonometry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(physicist, use trigonometry)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(engineer, use math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(architect, know math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(architect, know math)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(engineer, use math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(architect, use trigonometry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(architect, use trigonometry)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(engineer, use math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(engineer, use math)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(engineer, use math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(engineer, need math)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(engineer, use math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(engineer, use algebra)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(engineer, use math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(engineer, need math)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(engineer, use math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(engineer, use algebra)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(engineer, use math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(engineer, use algebra)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(engineer, use math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(engineer, need math)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(engineer, use math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(engineer, use maths)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(engineer, use math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(engineer, use maths)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(engineer, use math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(engineer, use maths)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(engineer, use math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(engineer, need math)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(engineer, use math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(engineer, use algebra)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(engineer, use math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(engineer, use maths)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(engineer, use math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(engineer, use math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(engineer, use math)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(engineer, use math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(engineer, use math)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.50
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(engineer, use math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(construction worker, use math)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(engineer, use math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(contractor, use math)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(engineer, use math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(construction worker, need math)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(engineer, use math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(construction worker, use algebra)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(engineer, use math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(contractor, use algebra)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(engineer, use math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(architect, use math)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(engineer, use math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(physicist, use math)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(engineer, use math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(architect, need math)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(engineer, use math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(architect, know math)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(engineer, use math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(architect, use algebra)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(engineer, use math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(physicist, use trigonometry)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(engineer, use math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(architect, use trigonometry)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(engineer, use math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(construction worker, use math)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(engineer, use math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(construction worker, need math)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(engineer, use math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(contractor, use math)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(engineer, use math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(construction worker, use algebra)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(engineer, use math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(contractor, use algebra)