engineer: use maths

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents scientist
Weight: 0.70
, expert
Weight: 0.65
, contractor
Weight: 0.65
, construction worker
Weight: 0.65
, employee
Weight: 0.65
Siblings physicist
Weight: 0.57
, james watt
Weight: 0.54
, geologist
Weight: 0.37
, architect
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
use maths 1.00
need mathematics 0.86
use math 0.85
need math 0.82
know math 0.81
need much math 0.81
have good at math 0.81
use algebra 0.79
use math in jobs 0.79
use trigonometry 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(contractor, use math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(engineer, use maths)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(contractor, use algebra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(engineer, use maths)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(construction worker, use math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(engineer, use maths)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(construction worker, need math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(engineer, use maths)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(construction worker, use algebra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(engineer, use maths)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(engineer, use maths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(construction worker, use algebra)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(engineer, use maths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(construction worker, use math)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(engineer, use maths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(construction worker, need math)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(engineer, use maths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(contractor, use algebra)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(engineer, use maths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(contractor, use math)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(engineer, use maths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, use math)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(engineer, use maths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(contractor, use math)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(engineer, use maths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, need math)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(engineer, use maths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, use algebra)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(engineer, use maths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(contractor, use algebra)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(engineer, use maths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(architect, use math)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(engineer, use maths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(physicist, use math)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(engineer, use maths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(architect, need math)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(engineer, use maths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(architect, know math)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(engineer, use maths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(architect, use algebra)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(engineer, use maths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(architect, use trigonometry)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(engineer, use maths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(physicist, use trigonometry)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(contractor, use math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(engineer, use maths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(engineer, use maths)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(construction worker, use math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(engineer, use maths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(engineer, use maths)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(construction worker, need math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(engineer, use maths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(engineer, use maths)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(contractor, use algebra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(engineer, use maths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(engineer, use maths)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(construction worker, use algebra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(engineer, use maths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(engineer, use maths)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(engineer, use maths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(architect, use math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(architect, use math)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(engineer, use maths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(physicist, use math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(physicist, use math)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(engineer, use maths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(architect, use algebra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(architect, use algebra)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(engineer, use maths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(physicist, use trigonometry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(physicist, use trigonometry)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(engineer, use maths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(architect, need math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(architect, need math)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(engineer, use maths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(architect, know math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(architect, know math)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(engineer, use maths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(architect, use trigonometry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(architect, use trigonometry)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(engineer, use maths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(engineer, use maths)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(engineer, use maths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(engineer, use math)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(engineer, use maths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(engineer, use math)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(engineer, use maths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(engineer, use math)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(engineer, use maths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(engineer, use algebra)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(engineer, use maths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(engineer, use algebra)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(engineer, use maths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(engineer, use algebra)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(engineer, use maths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(engineer, need math)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(engineer, use maths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(engineer, need math)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(engineer, use maths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(engineer, need math)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(engineer, use maths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(engineer, use math)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(engineer, use maths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(engineer, use algebra)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(engineer, use maths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(engineer, need math)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(engineer, use maths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(engineer, use maths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(engineer, use maths)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(engineer, use maths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(engineer, use maths)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(engineer, use maths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(construction worker, use math)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(engineer, use maths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(contractor, use math)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(engineer, use maths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(construction worker, need math)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(engineer, use maths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(construction worker, use algebra)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(engineer, use maths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(contractor, use algebra)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(engineer, use maths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(architect, use math)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(engineer, use maths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(physicist, use math)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(engineer, use maths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(architect, need math)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(engineer, use maths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(architect, know math)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(engineer, use maths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(architect, use algebra)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(engineer, use maths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(physicist, use trigonometry)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(engineer, use maths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(architect, use trigonometry)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(engineer, use maths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(construction worker, use math)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(engineer, use maths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(construction worker, need math)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(engineer, use maths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(contractor, use math)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(engineer, use maths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(construction worker, use algebra)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(engineer, use maths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(contractor, use algebra)