architect: know math

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents contractor
Weight: 0.71
, design
Weight: 0.71
, artist
Weight: 0.64
, plan
Weight: 0.63
, specialist
Weight: 0.62
Siblings engineer
Weight: 0.36
, builder
Weight: 0.35
, painter
Weight: 0.35
, carpenter
Weight: 0.34
, construction worker
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
know math 1.00
need math 0.95
use math 0.94
relate to math 0.91
use algebra 0.85
need trigonometry 0.82
use trigonometry 0.80
use calculus 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(contractor, use math)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(architect, know math)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(contractor, use algebra)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(architect, know math)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(architect, know math)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(contractor, use math)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(architect, know math)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(contractor, use algebra)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(architect, know math)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(contractor, use math)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(architect, know math)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(contractor, use algebra)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(architect, know math)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(painter, use math)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(architect, know math)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(engineer, use math)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(architect, know math)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(engineer, need math)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(architect, know math)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(carpenter, use math)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(architect, know math)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, use math)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(architect, know math)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(engineer, use algebra)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(architect, know math)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(builder, use algebra)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(architect, know math)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, need math)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(architect, know math)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(carpenter, use algebra)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(architect, know math)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, use algebra)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(architect, know math)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(engineer, use calculus)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(architect, know math)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(carpenter, use trigonometry)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(contractor, use math)
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(architect, know math)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(architect, know math)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(contractor, use algebra)
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(architect, know math)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(architect, know math)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(architect, know math)
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(painter, use math)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(painter, use math)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(architect, know math)
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(engineer, use math)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(engineer, use math)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(architect, know math)
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(engineer, need math)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(engineer, need math)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(architect, know math)
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(carpenter, use math)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(carpenter, use math)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(architect, know math)
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(construction worker, need math)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(construction worker, need math)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(architect, know math)
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(engineer, use algebra)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(engineer, use algebra)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(architect, know math)
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(construction worker, use math)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(construction worker, use math)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(architect, know math)
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(builder, use algebra)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(builder, use algebra)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(architect, know math)
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(carpenter, use algebra)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(carpenter, use algebra)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(architect, know math)
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(engineer, use calculus)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(engineer, use calculus)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(architect, know math)
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(construction worker, use algebra)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(construction worker, use algebra)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(architect, know math)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(carpenter, use trigonometry)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(carpenter, use trigonometry)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(architect, know math)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(architect, know math)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(architect, know math)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(architect, use math)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(architect, know math)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(architect, use math)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(architect, know math)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(architect, use math)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(architect, know math)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(architect, use algebra)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(architect, know math)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(architect, use algebra)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(architect, know math)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(architect, use algebra)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(architect, know math)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(architect, relate to math)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(architect, know math)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(architect, need math)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(architect, know math)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(architect, need math)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(architect, know math)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(architect, use math)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(architect, know math)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(architect, relate to math)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(architect, know math)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(architect, relate to math)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(architect, know math)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(architect, need math)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(architect, know math)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(architect, need math)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(architect, know math)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(architect, use algebra)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(architect, know math)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(architect, relate to math)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(architect, know math)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(architect, use calculus)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(architect, know math)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(architect, use calculus)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(architect, know math)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(architect, use calculus)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(architect, know math)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(architect, use calculus)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(architect, know math)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(architect, use trigonometry)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(architect, know math)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(architect, need trigonometry)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(architect, know math)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(architect, need trigonometry)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(architect, know math)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(architect, need trigonometry)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(architect, know math)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(architect, need trigonometry)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(architect, know math)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(architect, use trigonometry)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(architect, know math)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(architect, use trigonometry)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(architect, know math)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(architect, use trigonometry)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(architect, know math)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(architect, know math)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(architect, know math)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(architect, know math)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(architect, know math)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(architect, know math)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(contractor, use math)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(architect, know math)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(contractor, use algebra)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(architect, know math)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(painter, use math)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(architect, know math)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(engineer, use math)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(architect, know math)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(engineer, need math)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(architect, know math)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(carpenter, use math)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(architect, know math)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(construction worker, need math)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(architect, know math)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(construction worker, use math)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(architect, know math)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(engineer, use algebra)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(architect, know math)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(carpenter, use algebra)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(architect, know math)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(builder, use algebra)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(architect, know math)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(construction worker, use algebra)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(architect, know math)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(engineer, use calculus)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(architect, know math)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(carpenter, use trigonometry)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(architect, know math)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(contractor, use math)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(architect, know math)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(contractor, use algebra)