carpenter: use trigonometry

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents construction worker
Weight: 0.70
, artist
Weight: 0.69
, craftsman
Weight: 0.65
, man
Weight: 0.64
Siblings mason
Weight: 0.38
, painter
Weight: 0.37
, bricklayer
Weight: 0.37
, electrician
Weight: 0.37
, roofer
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
use trigonometry 1.00
use algebra 0.87
use math 0.84
use maths 0.79
use math in job 0.78
use equations 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(construction worker, use math)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(carpenter, use trigonometry)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(construction worker, use algebra)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(carpenter, use trigonometry)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(carpenter, use trigonometry)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(construction worker, use algebra)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(carpenter, use trigonometry)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(construction worker, use math)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(carpenter, use trigonometry)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, use algebra)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(carpenter, use trigonometry)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, use math)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(carpenter, use trigonometry)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(painter, use math)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(carpenter, use trigonometry)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(electrician, use algebra)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(carpenter, use trigonometry)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(electrician, use math)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(carpenter, use trigonometry)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(electrician, use trigonometry)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(construction worker, use algebra)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(carpenter, use trigonometry)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(carpenter, use trigonometry)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(construction worker, use math)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(carpenter, use trigonometry)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(carpenter, use trigonometry)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(carpenter, use trigonometry)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(electrician, use trigonometry)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(electrician, use trigonometry)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(carpenter, use trigonometry)
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(electrician, use algebra)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(electrician, use algebra)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(carpenter, use trigonometry)
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(painter, use math)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(painter, use math)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(carpenter, use trigonometry)
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(electrician, use math)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(electrician, use math)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(carpenter, use trigonometry)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(carpenter, use trigonometry)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(carpenter, use trigonometry)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(carpenter, use algebra)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(carpenter, use trigonometry)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(carpenter, use algebra)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(carpenter, use trigonometry)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(carpenter, use algebra)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(carpenter, use trigonometry)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(carpenter, use math)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(carpenter, use trigonometry)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(carpenter, use math)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(carpenter, use trigonometry)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(carpenter, use maths)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(carpenter, use trigonometry)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(carpenter, use math)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(carpenter, use trigonometry)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(carpenter, use maths)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(carpenter, use trigonometry)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(carpenter, use maths)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(carpenter, use trigonometry)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(carpenter, use math in job)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(carpenter, use trigonometry)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(carpenter, use equations)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(carpenter, use trigonometry)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(carpenter, use algebra)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(carpenter, use trigonometry)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(carpenter, use math)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(carpenter, use trigonometry)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(carpenter, use equations)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(carpenter, use trigonometry)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(carpenter, use math in job)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(carpenter, use trigonometry)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(carpenter, use maths)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(carpenter, use trigonometry)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(carpenter, use math in job)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(carpenter, use trigonometry)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(carpenter, use equations)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(carpenter, use trigonometry)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(carpenter, use math in job)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(carpenter, use trigonometry)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(carpenter, use equations)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(carpenter, use trigonometry)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(carpenter, use trigonometry)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(carpenter, use trigonometry)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(carpenter, use trigonometry)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(carpenter, use trigonometry)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(carpenter, use trigonometry)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(construction worker, use math)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(carpenter, use trigonometry)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(construction worker, use algebra)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(carpenter, use trigonometry)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(electrician, use trigonometry)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(carpenter, use trigonometry)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(painter, use math)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(carpenter, use trigonometry)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(electrician, use algebra)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(carpenter, use trigonometry)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(electrician, use math)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(carpenter, use trigonometry)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(construction worker, use math)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(carpenter, use trigonometry)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(construction worker, use algebra)