carpenter: use math in job

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents construction worker
Weight: 0.70
, artist
Weight: 0.69
, craftsman
Weight: 0.65
, man
Weight: 0.64
Siblings mason
Weight: 0.38
, painter
Weight: 0.37
, bricklayer
Weight: 0.37
, electrician
Weight: 0.37
, roofer
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
use math in job 1.00
use math 0.92
use algebra 0.83
use maths 0.80
use trigonometry 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(construction worker, use math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(carpenter, use math in job)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(construction worker, use algebra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(carpenter, use math in job)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(carpenter, use math in job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(construction worker, use math)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(carpenter, use math in job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(construction worker, use algebra)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(carpenter, use math in job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, use math)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(carpenter, use math in job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, use algebra)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(carpenter, use math in job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(painter, use math)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(carpenter, use math in job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(electrician, use math)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(carpenter, use math in job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(electrician, use algebra)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(carpenter, use math in job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(electrician, use trigonometry)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(construction worker, use math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(carpenter, use math in job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(carpenter, use math in job)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(construction worker, use algebra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(carpenter, use math in job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(carpenter, use math in job)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(carpenter, use math in job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(painter, use math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(painter, use math)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(carpenter, use math in job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(electrician, use math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(electrician, use math)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(carpenter, use math in job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(electrician, use algebra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(electrician, use algebra)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(carpenter, use math in job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(electrician, use trigonometry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(electrician, use trigonometry)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(carpenter, use math in job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(carpenter, use math in job)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(carpenter, use math in job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(carpenter, use math)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(carpenter, use math in job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(carpenter, use math)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(carpenter, use math in job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(carpenter, use math)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(carpenter, use math in job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(carpenter, use math)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(carpenter, use math in job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(carpenter, use algebra)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(carpenter, use math in job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(carpenter, use algebra)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(carpenter, use math in job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(carpenter, use algebra)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(carpenter, use math in job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(carpenter, use maths)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(carpenter, use math in job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(carpenter, use maths)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(carpenter, use math in job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(carpenter, use maths)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(carpenter, use math in job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(carpenter, use algebra)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(carpenter, use math in job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(carpenter, use maths)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(carpenter, use math in job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(carpenter, use trigonometry)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(carpenter, use math in job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(carpenter, use trigonometry)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(carpenter, use math in job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(carpenter, use trigonometry)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(carpenter, use math in job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(carpenter, use trigonometry)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(carpenter, use math in job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(carpenter, use math in job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(carpenter, use math in job)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(carpenter, use math in job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(carpenter, use math in job)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(carpenter, use math in job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(construction worker, use math)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(carpenter, use math in job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(construction worker, use algebra)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(carpenter, use math in job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(painter, use math)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(carpenter, use math in job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(electrician, use math)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(carpenter, use math in job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(electrician, use trigonometry)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(carpenter, use math in job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(electrician, use algebra)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(carpenter, use math in job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(construction worker, use math)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(carpenter, use math in job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(construction worker, use algebra)